Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Accompanied by some fifty of his suffragans, Athanasius had made the
journey, only to find himself confronted by a packed council. All his
bitterest enemies were there; all the old unsubstantiated charges were
resuscitated. His election was said to be uncanonical; he was charged
with personal unchastity and with cruelty towards certain Meletian
bishops and priests; and, most curious of all, the ancient calumnies of
“The Broken Chalice” and “The Dead Man’s Hand” were revived and pressed,
as though they had never been confuted. With respect to the latter
charge, Athanasius enjoyed one moment of signal triumph. After his
accusers had caused a thrill of horror to pass through the Council by
producing a blackened and withered hand, which they declared to belong
to the missing Bishop Arsenius, who was supposed to have suffered foul
play, Athanasius asked whether any of those present had known Arsenius
personally. A number of bishops claimed acquaintance, and then
Athanasius gave the signal for a man, who was standing by closely
muffled in a cloak, to come forward. “Lift up your head!” said
Athanasius. The unknown did so, and lo! it was none other than Arsenius
himself. Athanasius drew aside the cloak, first from one hand and then
from the other. “Has God given to any man,” he asked quietly, “more
hands than two?” His enemies were silenced, but only for the moment. One
of them, cleverer than the rest, immediately exclaimed that this was
mere sorcery and devil’s work; the man was not Arsenius; in fact, he was
not even a man at all, but a mere counterfeit, an illusion of the senses
produced by Athanasius’ horrible proficiency in the black art. And we
are told that this ingenious explanation proved so convincing to the
assembly, and created such a fury of resentment against Athanasius, that
Dionysius, the Imperial officer who had been deputed by Constantine to
represent him at the Council, had to hurry Athanasius on shipboard to
save him from personal violence.
There was clearly so little corroborative evidence against Athanasius
that the Council dared not convict him. But, as they were equally
determined not to acquit him, they appointed a commission of enquiry to
collect testimony on the spot in the Mareotis district of Egypt with
respect to the story of the Broken Chalice. The six commissioners were
chosen in secret session by the anti-Athanasian faction. Athanasius
protested without avail against the selection: they were all, he said,
his private enemies. The commission sailed for Egypt, and Athanasius
determined, with characteristic boldness, to go to Constantinople,
confront the Emperor, and appeal for justice and a fair trial at the
fountainhead. Athanasius met the Emperor as he was riding into the city,
and stood before him in his path. What followed is best told by
Constantine himself in a letter which he wrote to the Bishop of
Tyre.[123] Here are his own words:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account