Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
We have spoken of a marked degeneracy observable in Constantine as his
life drew to a close. Perhaps the clearest proof of this is to be found
in a momentous step taken by him in 335, when he divided the sovereignty
of the world among his heirs. Such a partition meant the stultification
of his political career, for he thus destroyed at a blow the political
unity which he had so laboriously restored out of the wreck of the
system of Diocletian.
Eusebius gives us the truth in a single sentence when he says that
Constantine treated the Empire for the purposes of this division as
though he were apportioning his private patrimony among members of his
own family.[133] He was much more concerned to make handsome provision
for his sons and nephews than to secure the peace and well-being of his
subjects. Crispus had now been dead nine years, and the three sons of
Constantine and Fausta were still young, the eldest being only just
twenty-one. Eusebius tells us how carefully they had been trained. They
had been instructed in all martial exercises, and special professors had
been engaged to make them proficient in political affairs and a
knowledge of the laws. Their religious education had been personally
supervised by their father, who zealously sowed “the seeds of godly
reverence” and impressed upon them that “a knowledge of God, who is the
king of all things, and true piety were more deserving of honour than
riches or even than sovereignty itself.” Admirable precepts and Eusebius
declares again and again that this “Trinity of Princes”—so he calls them
in one place—were models of deportment, modesty, and piety.
Unfortunately, we know how emphatically their future careers belied
their early promise and the eulogies of the Bishop of Cæsarea. We do not
doubt his statement that Constantine spared no effort to educate them
aright, but it was most unfortunate that the remarkable success of their
father’s political career bore testimony rather to the efficacy of
ambition without scruple than of “godly reverence and true piety.”
-----
Footnote 133:
οἷα τινα πατρώαν οὐσίαν τοὶς αὐτõυ κληροδοτῶν φιλτάτοις.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account