Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
triumphant ascent of Elijah; the latter would regard it as the token of
a natural apotheosis. The hand might equally well be the hand of God or
of Jupiter.
[Illustration:
THE SUPPOSED SARCOPHAGI OF CONSTANTINE THE GREAT AND THEODOSIUS
THE GREAT.
FROM GROSVENOR’S “CONSTANTINOPLE.”]
]
Such is the story of the Emperor’s baptism, death, and burial as
recounted by Eusebius. There is, however, one important detail to be
added and one important question to be asked. Constantine was baptised
by an Arian bishop. To the Athanasian party and to the ecclesiastical
historians of succeeding ages this was a lamentable circumstance which
greatly exercised and troubled their minds. It sorely grieved them to
think that their patron Constantine should have been admitted into the
communion of the faithful by the dangerous heretic who had been the
bitterest enemy of their idol, Athanasius. But with a forbearance to
which they were usually strangers, they agreed to pass over the episode
in comparative silence and remember not the shortcomings but the virtues
of the first Christian Emperor.
It still remains to be asked why Constantine did not formally enter the
Church until he was on his death-bed. There had been no lukewarmness
about his Christianity. He was not one to be afflicted with doubts.
There had never been any danger of his reverting to paganism. In the
last few years, indeed, he had been distracted by the clamour of Arians
and Athanasians, and his was a mind upon which a clever and acute
ecclesiastic, who enjoyed his confidence, could play at will. When
Hosius of Cordova stood by his side he was the champion of the Catholic
party; when Hosius fell from favour and Eusebius of Nicomedia took his
place Constantine strongly inclined to the Arian side. But in neither
case was there any doubt of his Christianity. Why then did he not become
a member of the Church? Was it because the rite of baptism conferred
immediate forgiveness of sin and therefore a death-bed baptism
infallibly opened the gate of Heaven? By putting off entrance into the
Church until the hour had come after which it was hardly possible to
commit sin, did Constantine count upon making sure of eternal happiness?
Such is the motive assigned by some historians. It certainly is not a
lofty one. Yet the idea may very well have presented itself to
Constantine’s mind and the impression left by Eusebius’s narrative is
that Constantine only determined to receive the rite because he felt his
end to be near and dared not put it off any longer. On the other hand,
Constantine’s statement that his ambition had been to be baptised in
Jordan is rather against this theory. Possibly, too, he was to some
degree influenced by the wish not to alienate entirely the support of
his pagan subjects, especially the more fanatical of them, who would
bitterly resent their Chief Pontiff becoming a baptised member of the
Christian Church. No one can say, but we shall be the better able to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account