Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church — John Shaqi
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
a young semi-barbarian named Maximin Daza. “Why, who is this you offer
me?” “He is my kinsman,” is the reply. Then said Diocletian, with a
groan, “These are not fit men to whom to entrust the care of the State.”
“I have proved them,” said Galerius. “Well, you must look to it,”
rejoins Diocletian, “you who are about to assume the reins of the
Empire. I have toiled enough. While I ruled, I took care that the State
stood safe. If any harm now befalls, the fault is not mine.”[16]
-----
Footnote 16:
Lactant., _De Mort. Persec._, c. 18.
-----
Such is a characteristic specimen of Lactantius’s history, and so, when
he comes to describe the ceremony of abdication, he makes Galerius draw
Maximin Daza to the front of the group of imperial officials by whom
Diocletian is surrounded, and represents the soldiers as staring in
surprise at their new Cæsar, as at one whom they had never seen before.
Yet a favourite nephew of Galerius can scarcely have been a stranger to
the troops of Nicomedia. Galerius not only—according to Lactantius—drew
forward Maximin Daza, but at the same time rudely thrust back into the
throng the son of Constantius, the senior of the two new Augusti. This
was young Constantine, the future Emperor, who for some years past had
been living at the Court of Diocletian.
But it was no broken down Emperor in his dotage, passing, according to
the spasms of his malady, from sanity to insanity, who resigned the
throne on the plain of Nicomedia. Diocletian was but fifty-nine years of
age. He had just recovered, it is true, from a very severe illness,
which, even on the testimony of Lactantius, had caused “grief in the
palace, sadness and tears among his guards, and anxious suspense
throughout the whole State.”[17] But his brain was never clearer than
when he took final leave of his troops. His abdication was the
culminating point of his policy. He had planned it twenty years before.
He had kept it before his eyes throughout a long and busy reign. It was
the completion of, the finishing touch to his great political system. It
would have been perfectly easy for Diocletian to forswear himself.
Probably very few of his contemporaries believed that he would fulfil
his promise to abdicate after twenty years of reign. Kings talk of the
allurements of retirement, but they usually cling to power as
tenaciously as to life. The first Augustus had delighted to mystify his
Ministers of State by speaking of restoring the Republic. He died an
Emperor. Diocletian, alone of the Roman Emperors, laid down the sceptre
when he was at the height of his glory. It was a hazardous experiment,
but he was faithful to his principles. He thought it best for the world
that its master should not grow old and feeble on the throne.
-----
Footnote 17:
_De Mort. Persec._, c. 17.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account