Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
No single historian has had a good word to say for Maxentius, who is
described by Lactantius as “a man of depraved mind, so consumed with
pride and stubbornness that he paid no deference or respect either to
his father or his father-in-law and was in consequence hated by
both.”[30] He had married a daughter of Galerius, but had been thrust on
one side at the choosing of the new Cæsars, and Severus and Maximin Daza
had been preferred to him. He owed his elevation to the purple to a
successful mutiny on the part of the Prætorians at Rome, and to the
general discontent of the Roman population. It is evident that Rome
watched with anger and jealousy the loss of her old exclusive and
imperial position. The Emperors no longer resided on the Palatine, and
ignored and disdained the city on the Tiber. Diocletian had preferred
Nicomedia; Maximian had fixed his Court at Milan. The imperial trappings
at Rome were becoming a mockery. When, in addition to neglect, it was
ordered that Italy should no longer be exempt from the census, and that
the sacred Saturnian soil should submit to the exactions of the
tax-gatherer, public opinion was ripe for revolt.
-----
Footnote 30:
_De Mort. Persec._, c. 18.
-----
Lactantius affects to see in the extension of the census to Rome a
crowning example of Galerius’s rapacity. He speaks of the Emperor
“devouring the whole world,” and declares that his madness carried him
to such outrageous lengths that he would not suffer even the Roman
people to escape bondage. But Galerius was thoroughly justified in the
step he took. The immunity of Rome from taxation had been a monstrous
piece of fiscal injustice to the rest of the world, designed merely to
flatter the pride and purse of the Roman citizen. Galerius, moreover,
had disbanded some of the Prætorians—who were at once the Household
Troops and the permanent garrison of the capital; but now that the
Emperor and the Court had quitted Rome, their _raison d’être_ was gone.
The vast expenditure on their pay and their barracks was money thrown
away. Galerius, therefore, abolished the Prætorian camps. Such an act
would give clear warning that the absence of the Emperors was not merely
temporary, but permanent, that the shifting of the capital had been due
not merely to personal predilections, but to abiding political reasons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account