Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Constantine and Licinius now shared between them the whole of the Roman
Empire. They were allies, but their alliance did not long stand the
strain of their respective ambitions. Each had won an easy victory over
his antagonist, and each was confident that his legions would suffice to
win him undivided empire. We know very little of the pretexts assigned
for the quarrel which culminated in the war of 316. Zosimus throws the
blame upon Constantine, whom he accuses of not keeping faith and of
trying to filch from Licinius some of his provinces. But as the
sympathies of Zosimus were strongly pagan and as he invariably imputed
the worst possible motive to Constantine, it is fairest and most
reasonable to suppose that the two Emperors simply quarrelled over the
division of the Empire. Constantine had given the hand of his
half-sister Anastasia to one of his generals, named Bassianus, whom he
had raised to the dignity of a Cæsar. But for some reason left
unexplained—possibly because Constantine granted only the title, without
the legions and the provinces, of a Cæsar—Bassianus became discontented
with his position and entered into an intrigue with Licinius.
Constantine discovered the plot, put Bassianus to death, and demanded
from Licinius the surrender of Senecio, a brother of the victim and a
relative of Licinius. The demand was refused; some statues of
Constantine were demolished by Licinius’s orders at Æmona (Laybach) and
war ensued.
The armies met in the autumn of 316 near Cibalis, in Pannonia, between
the rivers Drave and Save. Neither Emperor led into the field anything
approaching the full strength he was able to muster; Licinius is said to
have had only 35,000 men and Constantine no more than 20,000. From
Zosimus’s highly rhetorical account of the battle[59] we gather that
Constantine chose a position between a steep hill and an impassable
morass, and repulsed the charge of the legions of Licinius. Then as he
advanced into the plain in pursuit of the enemy, he was checked by some
fresh troops which Licinius brought up, and a long and stubborn contest
lasted until nightfall, when Constantine decided the fortunes of the day
by an irresistible charge. Licinius is said to have lost 20,000 men in
this encounter, more than fifty per cent. of his entire force, and he
beat a hurried retreat, leaving his camp to be plundered by the victor,
whose own losses must also have been severe.
-----
Footnote 59:
Zosimus, ii., 19.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account