Consumers and Wage-Earners: The Ethics of Buying CheapRoss, J. Elliot (John Elliot)
Philosophy
Consumers and Wage-Earners: The Ethics of Buying Cheap
Ross, J. Elliot (John Elliot)
Consumers -- United States; Wages; Wages -- United States
[45] H. Sidgwick, "Principles of Political Economy," p. 297: London,
1887.
[46] Cf. "Wage-Earning Women in Stores and Factories," p. 22: U. S.
Bureau of Labor, 1911.
[47] W. Cunningham, "Christianity and Social Questions," p. 118: London,
1910.
[48] J. B. Clark, "Essentials of Economic Theory," pp. 453 and 456: N.
Y., 1907.
CHAPTER FIVE
INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONS: WAGES
What has been said regarding industrial conditions is not mere
theorizing. Private, state and federal investigations into actual
conditions confirm the contention that there is a large margin of
unemployed, and that a considerable portion of those who do find
employment are overworked and underpaid regardless of life and limb.
Anyone who studies the various official reports on this subject, must
conclude that Dr. Devine's summary of the _Pittsburgh Survey_ was well
within the truth and is applicable to practically the whole country:
"Low wages for the great majority of the laborers employed by the
mills, not lower than in other large cities, but low compared with
the prices--so low as to be inadequate to the maintenance of a
normal American standard of living; wages adjusted to the single
man in the lodging house, not the responsible head of a family.
"Still lower wages for women, who receive, for example, in one of
the metal trades, in which the proportion of women is great enough
to be menacing, one-half as much as unorganized men in the same
shops and one-third as much as men in the union.
"The destruction of family life; not in any imaginary or mystical
sense, but by the demands of the day's work, and by the very
demonstrable and material method of typhoid fever and industrial
accidents; both preventable, but both costing in single years in
Pittsburgh considerably more than a thousand lives, and
irretrievably shattering nearly as many homes."[49]
Assuming, throughout this discussion, that $6.00 a week ($1.00 a week
less than Miss Butler's estimate), or $312.00 a year is the lowest fair
individual wage; and $11.00 a week, or $572.00 a year is the lowest fair
family living wage:[50] it is easy to show from reliable reports that
scores of thousands of individuals and heads of families fall below this
standard. But in considering any figures quoted here, or to be found
elsewhere, it should always be remembered that the actual wage may be
much below the rate of wage. One employed at the rate of $6.00 a week
may not make anything like that because of loss of time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account