Sir, look again at Literature. The Bleater’s London Correspondent is not
merely acquainted with all the eminent writers, but is in possession of
the secrets of their souls. He is versed in their hidden meanings and
references, sees their manuscripts before publication, and knows the
subjects and titles of their books when they are not begun. How dare
those writers turn upon the eminent man and depart from every intention
they have confided to him? How do they justify themselves in entirely
altering their manuscripts, changing their titles, and abandoning their
subjects? Will they deny, in the face of Tattlesnivel, that they do so?
If they have such hardihood, let the file of the Bleater strike them
dumb. By their fruits they shall be known. Let their works be compared
with the anticipatory letters of the Bleater’s London Correspondent, and
their falsehood and deceit will become manifest as the sun; it will be
seen that they do nothing which they stand pledged to the Bleater’s
London Correspondent to do; it will be seen that they are among the
blackest parties in this black and base conspiracy. This will become
apparent, sir, not only as to their public proceedings but as to their
private affairs. The outraged Tattlesnivellian who now drags this
infamous combination into the face of day, charges those literary persons
with making away with their property, imposing on the Income Tax
Commissioners, keeping false books, and entering into sham contracts. He
accuses them on the unimpeachable faith of the London Correspondent of
the Tattlesnivel Bleater. With whose evidence they will find it
impossible to reconcile their own account of any transaction of their
lives.
The national character is degenerating under the influence of the
ramifications of this tremendous conspiracy. Forgery is committed,
constantly. A person of note—any sort of person of note—dies. The
Bleater’s London Correspondent knows what his circumstances are, what his
savings are (if any), who his creditors are, all about his children and
relations, and (in general, before his body is cold) describes his will.
Is that will ever proved? Never! Some other will is substituted; the
real instrument, destroyed. And this (as has been before observed), is
England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account