Conversations on the Plurality of WorldsFontenelle, M. de (Bernard Le Bovier)
Philosophy
Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds
Fontenelle, M. de (Bernard Le Bovier)
Plurality of worlds
It would certainly, I replied be more in character, to trace only
the footsteps of lovers; that is to say, your name, engraved by your
adorers on the bark of every tree. No more of adorers, cried she;
let us talk of the sun. I understand perfectly why we imagined it
performing the revolution which is merely effected by our own motion,
but this circle requires a year; how, then, does the sun appear to go
round us every day? You undoubtedly know, I replied, that if a ball
were rolled along this walk it would have two sorts of motion; it would
go towards the end of the walk, and at the same time turn several
times on its own axis, so that the side of the ball which is at first
uppermost will presently descend, and the other, of course, rise to
the top. This is the case with the earth: whilst she is proceeding,
through the year, in her orbit round the sun, she turns on her own axis
every twenty-four hours: each part, therefore, of the earth loses, and
recovers sight of the sun during that time. When in the morning we turn
towards the sun, it seems to rise; and when, by continued rotation, we
again are more distant from it, it appears to descend. That's curious
enough, said she; the earth undertakes every thing, and the sun does
nothing at all: and when the moon, the other planets, and the fixed
stars appear to pass over us in four-and-twenty hours, it is merely
imagination. Exactly so, I replied, and produced by the same cause.
The planets perform their revolutions round the sun in unequal periods
of time, in consequence of their different distances from it; and one
which we see to day answer to a certain point in the zodiac, or circle
of fixed stars, will to-morrow at the same hour answer to some other
point: this is the effect both of the progress which the planet has
made in its orbit and of that which we have made in ours. We move
onward; the other planets do the same, but we do not continue all in a
line: this occasions us to see them in such different situations, and
renders their course apparently irregular. You now understand that such
irregularity depends only on the different points from which we view
them, and that, in reality all their movements are directed by the most
exact order. It may be so, answered the Marchioness; but I should be
glad if their order did not cost the earth so much: you seem to have
very little consideration for it, and to require an astonishing agility
in so large a body. But, said I, do you think it more reasonable for
the sun, and all the other heavenly bodies, which are extremely large,
to perform in four-and-twenty hours an immense journey round the earth?
That the fixed stars, being in the largest circle, should travel, in
the course of a day, more than twenty-seven thousand six hundred and
sixty times two hundred millions of leagues?[11] All this must be if
the earth does not turn on her axis every twenty-four hours. Surely
there is much more rationality in supposing our globe to turn, which
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account