Correspondence, between the late Commodore Stephen Decatur and Commodore James Barron, which led to the unfortunate meeting of the twenty-second of MarchDecatur, Stephen
History
Correspondence, between the late Commodore Stephen Decatur and Commodore James Barron, which led to the unfortunate meeting of the twenty-second of March
Produced by Ernest Schaal and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
CORRESPONDENCE,
BETWEEN THE LATE
COMMODORE STEPHEN DECATUR
AND
COMMODORE JAMES BARRON,
WHICH LED TO THE
UNFORTUNATE MEETING
OF THE
TWENTY SECOND OF MARCH
* * * * *
BOSTON:
PRINTED BY RUSSELL & GARDNER.
1820.
The friends of the late Commodore DECATUR, have learned, with very great
regret, that misconceptions injurious to him prevail, and are extending,
relative to the difference between him and Commodore BARRON. To place
the subject in its true light, they have thought it necessary to submit
to the public, without comment, the whole correspondence which preceded
the meeting.
CORRESPONDENCE, &c.
* * * * *
No. 1.
HAMPTON, (VA.) JUNE 12,[1] 1819.
SIR: I have been informed, in Norfolk, that you have said that you could
insult me with impunity, or words to that effect. If you have said so,
you will no doubt avow it, and I shall expect to hear from you.
I am, sir, your obedient servant,
JAMES BARRON.
To Commodore STEPHEN DECATUR,
_Washington_.
[1] With respect to the date of this letter, it may be proper to
observe, that, although it is 12th June, yet the figure 2, as made,
might well be mistaken for a 3: hence, in Commodore Decatur's letter of
reply, he considered the date to be 13th June. On referring, however, to
the post mark on the back of the letter, it was found to have been put
into the post office on the 12th: hence, in Commodore Decatur's letter
to Commodore Barron, of the 31st October, 1819, it is recognized as
dated on the 12th.
* * * * *
No. 2.
WASHINGTON, JUNE 17, 1819.
SIR: I have received your communication of the 13th instant. Before you
could have been entitled to the information you have asked of me, you
should have given up the name of your informer. That frankness which
ought to characterize our profession required it. I shall not, however,
refuse to answer you on that account, but shall be as candid in my
communication to you as your letter or the case will warrant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account