The common story of Demosthenes’s confession that he had taken great
pleasure in hearing of a Tanker-woman say as he passed, “This is that
Demosthenes,” is wonderful ridiculous from so solid an orator. I myself
have often met with that temptation to vanity (if it were any), but am so
far from finding it any pleasure, that it only makes me run faster from
the place, till I get, as it were, out of sight shot. Democritus
relates, and in such a manner, as if he gloried in the good fortune and
commodity of it, that when he came to Athens, nobody there did so much as
take notice of him; and Epicurus lived there very well, that is, lay hid
many years in his gardens, so famous since that time, with his friend
Metrodorus: after whose death, making in one of his letters a kind
commemoration of the happiness which they two had enjoyed together, he
adds at last, that he thought it no disparagement to those great
felicities of their life, that in the midst of the most talked of and
talking country in the world, they had lived so long, not only without
fame, but almost without being heard of. And yet within a very few years
afterward, there were no two names of men more known or more generally
celebrated. If we engage into a large acquaintance and various
familiarities, we set open our gates to the invaders of most of our time:
we expose our life to a Quotidian Ague of frigid impertinences, which
would make a wise man tremble to think of. Now, as for being known much
by sight, and pointed at, I cannot comprehend the honour that lies in
that. Whatsoever it be, every mountebank has it more than the best
doctor, and the hangman more than the Lord Chief Justice of a city.
Every creature has it both of nature and art if it be any ways
extraordinary. It was as often said, “This is that Bucephalus,” or,
“This is that Incitatus,” when they were led prancing through the
streets, as “This is that Alexander,” or, “This is that Domitian”; and
truly for the latter, I take Incitatus to have been a much more
honourable beast than his master, and more deserving the consulship than
he the empire. I love and commend a true good fame, because it is the
shadow of virtue; not that it doth any good to the body which it
accompanies, but ’tis an efficacious shadow, and like that of St. Peter
cures the diseases of others. The best kind of glory, no doubt, is that
which is reflected from honesty, such as was the glory of Cato and
Aristides, but it was harmful to them both, and is seldom beneficial to
any man whilst he lives; what it is to him after his death, I cannot say,
because I love not philosophy merely notional and conjectural, and no man
who has made the experiment has been so kind as to come back to inform
us. Upon the whole matter, I account a person who has a moderate mind
and fortune, and lives in the conversation of two or three agreeable
friends, with little commerce in the world besides; who is esteemed well
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account