Craft-guilds of the thirteenth century in ParisMillett, Fred B. (Fred Benjamin)
Philosophy
Craft-guilds of the thirteenth century in Paris
Millett, Fred B. (Fred Benjamin)
Guilds -- France -- Paris -- History -- To 1500
About forty of the gilds were allowed to have as many apprentices as
they liked. Among these were the corn-dealers, the gold-beaters, the
ale-brewers, green-grocers, farriers, drawers of iron wire, millers,
shoe-makers and the _barilliers_. Usually, however, the number was
limited to one or two. The mercers, the fullers, weavers of silk-stuffs,
knife-handle and blade makers were allowed to have two, while the
rope-makers, pewterers, precious stone dealers, braid-makers, drapers,
goldsmiths, and shield-makers contented themselves with one. The
motives for such limitation were at least _double_: the altruistic
reason was that the master should not have too many to teach well; the
self-protective reason was that the gild should at no time be swamped in
competition by too many (prospective) masters.
The term of apprenticeship was also most scrupulously fixed. The
conditions are usually a definite term without payment of fee or a term
gradually lessened according to the increase in the size of the fee. The
haberdashers and the pewterers could fix the duration of apprenticeship
at will; other terms vary from 3 to 8, to 10-12 years, with fees varying
from 20 Parisian _sous_ (5 fr.) to 100 Parisian _sous_ (20 fr.), by means
of which the apprentice could buy off part of his time of service.
There seems, however, to have been no attempt to make the time directly
proportionate to the costliness of the raw material and the difficulty
of the process, or the skill required in the craft. The rope-makers
require an apprenticeship of 4 years, the brass-wire drawers 6 years, the
chest-makers 7 years, the makers of iron shields 8 years, the curriers
of shoe-leather 9, the jewellers 10, and the coral and shell bead-makers
12 years. The wool-weavers demand 4 years plus 4 _livres_, 5 years and
3 _livres_, 6 years and one _livre_, or 7 years without fee. Power over
the length of term resided of course in the hands of the masters, and
the rules contain only the minimum requirement. We read, “No one can
or ought to take or have more than two apprentices, and he cannot take
them for less than 7 years of service and twenty _sous_ of Paris, which
apprentices must give to the masters; or at 7 years without money, but
more money and longer service he can require if need be.” How irrational
the terms were may be seen from the fact that while the goldsmith’s term
is 10 years, the brass-wire drawers (a far less “skilled” gild) required
10 years and 20 _sous_, or 12 years and no fee, and that of three
bead-making gilds, one demanded 6 years and 46 _sous_, another 10 years
and 46 _sous_, and the third 12 years without possible shortening of the
term. If the apprentice, however, bought off part of his regular term,
the master was not permitted to take another apprentice till the complete
period was over. An extra apprentice was sometimes allowed if the wife
of a master knew the trade. “No one of the craft aforesaid can have more
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account