Cranial Osteology of the Hylid Frog, Smilisca baudiniTrueb, Linda
Science
Cranial Osteology of the Hylid Frog, Smilisca baudini
Trueb, Linda
Skull; Smilisca baudini
Since no accounts comparable to the preceding for _Smilisca baudini_
are available for other hylid frogs, it is meaningless to attempt any
discussion dealing with character significance or variation within the
Hylidae. There is considerable literature treating bufonids,
leptodactylids, ranids, and various Old World genera (see Baldauf,
1955, for a review of these works). Likewise, a comparison at the
familial level based on the study of a single species seems inadequate
and premature. By way of summary and synoptic description a list of
cranial osteological characters of _Smilisca baudini_ is presented.
The items selected enable comparison with similar compilations by
other workers, and are based in part on my unpublished observations of
other hylids.
1. Compared to hylids not having integumentary-cranial
co-ossification, the dermal roofing bones of _Smilisca baudini_
are extensive, and the skull is well-ossified internally. In
contrast to most casque-headed hylids (those having
integumentary-cranial co-ossification), the dermal roofing bones
are much less extensive, the dermal sphenethmoid (see Trueb, 1966,
p. 563) is absent, and internal ossification is less extensive.
2. The solum nasi is not ossified; the septum nasi is ossified only
posteriorly, and the olfactory eminence is supported by the
cartilaginous solum nasi and the bony prevomer.
3. The lingual process is absent. There is no palatal cartilage
isolated between the premaxillaries.
4. The anterior end of the cavum medium lies anterior to the cavum
inferius.
5. The septomaxillary is basically a U-shaped structure and has a
dorsal, anteriorly curved, ramus on the lateral branch and a
longitudinal loop of bone ventrally.
6. A distinct pars nasalis is absent on the maxillary.
7. A cartilaginous sclera is present.
8. The taenia tecta marginalis and the tectum synoticum are the only
roofing cartilages present.
9. The external part of the plectral apparatus (columella) is
directed anterolaterally. The pars ascendens plectri is fused
with the crista parotica.
10. The pseudobasal process is fused to the otic capsule.
11. The cornu principalis of the hyale fuses with the pseudobasal
process.
12. Two acoustic foramina are present.
13. The sphenethmoid and prootic are synchondrotically united.
14. The frontoparietal is separate from the prootic and exoccipital.
15. The prootic and exoccipital are fused.
16. A bursa angularis oris is present.
LITERATURE CITED
BALDAUF, R. J.
1955. Contributions to the cranial morphology of _Bufo w. woodhousei_
Girard. Texas Jour. Sci., 7(3):275-311.
1958. A procedure for the staining and sectioning of the heads of
adult anurans. Texas Jour. Sci., 10(4):448-451.
DUELLMAN, W. E. AND L. TRUEB
1966. Neotropical hylid frogs, genus Smilisca. Univ. Kansas Publ.,
Mus. Nat. Hist., 17:281-375, pls. 1-12.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account