Creation Myths of Primitive America: In relation to the Religious History and Mental Development of Mankind — John Shaqi
Creation Myths of Primitive America: In relation to the Religious History and Mental Development of MankindCurtin, Jeremiah
Religion
Creation Myths of Primitive America: In relation to the Religious History and Mental Development of Mankind
Curtin, Jeremiah
Creation -- Mythology; Indian mythology -- North America; Indians of North America -- Folklore
In the oldest of the inscriptional versions of the "Book of the Dead"
on the walls of pyramids, we find the religion of Egypt advanced far
beyond the first stages of development. Though animals, birds,
reptiles, and insects occupy a prominent position in Egyptian
religion, it is not evident why they occupy that position. There is no
inscription or book to inform us. The earliest stage of Egyptian
religion is lost to us. Egyptian priests, when reproached for the
national worship rendered various animals, birds, reptiles, and
insects, creatures that were vile, useful, clean, or unclean, as the
case might be, were unable to give a cause for the worship. They were
unable for the reason that the mythologic account was unknown to them,
or had been lost or was unconsidered; whatever the reason, neither
papyrus nor inscription explains it.
The chief gods of priestly Egypt answered exactly to the Indian
divinities of the second class of myths in America, those which I have
called action myths. Among these the sun and the earth were very
prominent. Of the earliest gods of Egypt, those which answered to the
"first people," or divinities in American creation myths, we find no
account thus far. If we had that account, it would explain why there
are animals, reptiles, and insects in Egyptian religion.
In Greece those portions of the earliest mythology which were not lost
were obscured. The ancient creation myths were either misunderstood,
or were unknown to the educated at the period from which the first
literary monuments have come down to us. Hesiod arranged and shaped
Greek mythology to suit himself and his audience, so that it is quite
impossible to learn from that author what the primitive myths of
Greece were. If brought before him, he would doubtless have looked on
them much as a certain French Algonkin and Iroquois scholar of Canada
looked on the myths of America. The man had an extensive knowledge of
Algonkin and Iroquois words, but an utter contempt for Indian thought,
and no real knowledge of it whatever. When I mentioned Indian
mythology, he exclaimed: "Mais, Monsieur, c'est quelque chose
d'absurde."
No doubt the earliest creation myths were well known throughout rural
Greece among the illiterate, but there was no philosopher of that day
who knew their value. There was no man to consider them.
Roman mythology, as well as Greek, suffered from literary treatment,
and it is only by collecting detached fragments and facts of primitive
thought throughout the whole field of classic literature that we are
able to get at something beyond the official religion of polished
society in Greece and Rome.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account