Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 1 [of 3]Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
General
Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 1 [of 3]
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
England -- Social conditions -- 19th century -- Fiction
As she went off to sleep that night, there came to her the words of the
Master, ‘Inasmuch as ye have done it to the least of these My little
ones, ye have done it unto Me.’ At any rate, her reflections were more
pleasant than those of the Bishop’s wife next door, whose father was a
City banker, and who, as she heard the brougham set its mistress down,
said to herself: ‘What shocking hours these actresses keep! What
shocking lives they must lead, to be sure! What a misfortune it is to
have such a person for a neighbour!’ It is to be believed the Bishop
himself had rather a different train of thought. As a curate he had
often frequented the theatre, nor had he given up the habit when he
became a country rector. It is true, ever since his elevation to the
episcopal bench he had avoided the playhouse, not that he did not love it
in his heart of hearts as much as ever, ‘But, you see,’ as he was wont to
observe in his blandest manner, ‘the case is altered now. I have to
consider my eminent position, and the decorum due to the cloth. I must
think of the injurious influence I might exercise on the younger clergy,
and on the laity as well.’ He coincided with Bishop Lonsdale when he
said: ‘So long as the world thinks it safer for young ladies than for
bishops to take their chance of being corrupted by the theatre, he would
by no means offend the world.’
So completely had he managed to forget his former propensities, that when
it was hinted to him that there was a time when he was often to be seen
within a playhouse, he scarcely admitted it, adding, however, that he had
occasionally gone there, not for the purpose of gratifying a worldly
curiosity, but that he might qualify himself by a study of our great
actors to become an effective preacher and orator. He would have
recognised the actress, however, if his better-half had allowed him to do
so. But, naturally, not a fascinating woman herself, she would save her
lord and master from the snare of beauty, which is but skin-deep, after
all, and passing as the smile of an April sun. Thus she was given to
judge harshly of pretty women, especially such as had become connected
with the theatrical profession. Yet what an actor she had for her
husband! What were his apron and knee-breeches and shovel-hat but
theatrical properties to impress and over-awe the vulgar? As an actor,
indeed, few surpassed the Bishop. What a picture of devotion he was in
church, as with bowed head and uplifted hands he pronounced the
benediction! In gilded drawing-rooms, what an air he assumed of
Christian grace! In talk, no one was saintlier in his way, and yet, as
politician and Churchman, he had ever been on the side of the world, and
the Minister of the day ever trusted him, as it was known that his vote
was safe. His art was, Look much, and say little. ‘Habits of graceful
movement,’ says a writer on Mental Philosophy, ‘should be early impressed
on children, to prevent that _gaucherie_ which the want of an early
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account