Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 3 [of 3]Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
General
Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 3 [of 3]
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
England -- Social conditions -- 19th century -- Fiction
And this state of things is the consequence of the law of primogeniture,
says the ignorant reformer. It is not so. Our laws of settlement are to
be blamed as unfair and unjust. The main causes of agricultural
depression, and of continued wrongdoing on the part of landed
proprietors, are the laws which allow the owners to make deeds and wills
which for many years, and often long after the owners’ deaths, prevent
the land from being sold, or the estate from being divided, no matter how
expedient it may be that it should he sold, or no matter how foolish or
extravagant the owner may be. Mr. Kay illustrates this in a case in
which he had acted as trustee. This estate, about fifty or sixty years
ago, came into the hands of a young nobleman, whom he calls Lord A., when
he was twenty-one. He married when he was twenty-two, and the
marriage-deed gave him only a life interest in the estate, and settled
the property on his children. He had one child, and as soon as that
child was twenty-one another deed was made, giving that child only a life
interest in the estate, and settling it after his death on the children
he might leave in succession. Lord A. was an extravagant and reckless
man. He hunted the county; he kept open house; he lived as if his estate
were ten times as great as it really was. He gambled and lost heavily.
He raised money on his life interest. He finally fled from England
deeply in debt, and lived abroad. The remainder of the life interest was
sold to a Jew, who knew that he would lose all when Lord A. died, and
found his only profit in thinning the woods. That state of things lasted
forty years. The farmers had no leases or any security for expenditure.
The Jew would not spend a penny, nor would the gentleman who took the
mansion, because he could not tell when he might be turned out; and the
tenantry were prevented from doing fairly to the land or to themselves.
There was no one to support the schools or the church, or to look after
the labourers on the estate. The farm-buildings fell into decay; the
land was not properly drained or cultivated; the plantations were
injured, and the mansion was dilapidated. And all this vast extent of
mischief was the result of the deeds which the law had allowed the lord
and his heir to execute. Nor are such cases isolated. Nor is it
possible to over-estimate the wretchedness and poverty they create in
rural England. Perhaps, in time, Englishmen will demand the abolition of
laws which entail such bitter wrong on the community at large.
CHAPTER XXIV
THE HONEYMOON.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account