In the case of quartz ε is the greater, being 1.5534 for sodium light,
quartz being thus positive according to the convention already alluded
to; while ω is the smaller, namely, 1.5443. In the case of the other
widely distributed trigonally uniaxial mineral calcite, carbonate of
lime CaCO_{3}, the opposite is the case, ω being the greater, having the
value 1.6583 for sodium light, and ω the less, namely, 1.4864, calcite
being thus a negatively uniaxial substance. The amount of the double
refraction in the cases of the two minerals is very different, ε-ω for
quartz being 0.0091, and ω-ε for calcite being as much as 0.1719.
Calcite is indeed a mineral endowed with an especially large amount of
double refraction, a property which renders it so eminently suitable for
use in demonstrating the phenomenon, and for the construction of the
Nicol polarising prism, in which one of the two mutually perpendicularly
polarised rays, that which affords the index ω, is got rid of by total
reflection at a balsam joint, a large rhomb of calcite being cut in half
along a particular diagonal plane and the two halves cemented together
again with Canada balsam; the other ray, which affords ε (but not at its
minimum value), is transmitted as a beam of perfectly polarised light.
The result of this difference in the amount of the double refraction of
the two minerals quartz and calcite is very interesting as regards their
behaviour with polarised light. A thin plate of quartz, such as is often
found in the slices of rock sections employed for microscopic
investigation, of muscovite granite or quartz porphyry for instance, and
which is usually about one-fiftieth of a millimetre in thickness, shows
brilliant colours in a parallel beam of polarised light, the Nicol
prisms of the polarising microscope being crossed for the production of
the dark field before the introduction of the section-plate on the
stage. This is only true, however, when the plate has not been cut
perpendicularly to the axis, for such a thin plate thus cut does not
perceptibly affect the dark field, there being no double refraction of
rays transmitted along the axis, and the interference colours afforded
by crystal plates in polarised light being due to the interference of
the two rays produced by double refraction, one of which is retarded
behind the other so as to be in a different phase of vibration. Also,
the plate, even when cut obliquely, and best of all parallel, to the
axis, has to be rotated in its own plane (perpendicular to the optical
axis of the microscope), to the favourable position for the production
of the most brilliant colour. This especially favourable position is
halfway between (at 45° to) the positions at which darkness is afforded
by the plate. For on rotating the plate between the crossed Nicols it
becomes four times dark during a complete revolution, and at places
exactly 90° apart, known as the “extinction positions,” whenever, in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account