Lehmann’s view is that the ordinary effect of surface tension to cause
truly liquid particles to assume the spherical “drop” form is resisted
by a special force, which he terms “Gestaltungskraft,” and which we may
perhaps translate “Configuration-determining force.” This force he
considers is not identical with that of elasticity, but is that force by
virtue of which a “flowing crystal” continually seeks, while freely
swimming in the mother liquor or fused liquid, to take up its normal
configuration. Even if a spherical drop could be cut out of it, the
sphere would at once become a rod, prism, or pyramid or whatever the
normal configuration of the flowing crystals of the substance in
question might be.
The much debated term “liquid crystal” has been given by Lehmann to the
normal configuration of each of the now considerable number of
substances which have been discovered to exhibit the phenomena of
flowing crystals. The latter appellation “flowing crystal,” which
Lehmann also uses, appears to the author to be in many ways more
suitable, however, and would avoid much of the criticism which has been
levelled at the term “liquid crystal.”
As already indicated, Lehmann attributes the whole phenomena to a
fundamental cause, namely, anisotropy (optical dissimilarity in
different directions) of the molecules themselves, which he considers
must cause self-restoration of the structure after disturbance, a
process which he terms “spontaneous homœotropy.” He considers that it is
the molecular configuration-producing force, connected with the tabular
form of, and directionally differentiated distribution of energy and
force in, the single chemical molecules, which maintains the inner
structure of the flowing crystal in position. The polyhedral outward
form thus appears to be a necessary consequence of the inner structure,
on this basis that it is a force resident in the molecules themselves
which produces the structure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account