If there are three such faces inclined at right angles they would be
chosen in preference to all others, as they would certainly prove to be
faces of prime significance as regards the symmetry of the crystal. If
there are no such rectangularly inclined faces developed on the crystal,
then the three best developed faces nearest to 90° to each other are
chosen, the two factors of nearness to rectangularity and excellence of
development being simultaneously borne in mind in making the choice of
axial planes, and discretion used.
[Illustration:
FIG. 38.—The Cube and its Three Equal Rectangular Axes.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 39.—Tetragonal Prism and its three Rectangular Axes.
]
If the crystal belong to the cubic, tetragonal, or rhombic systems, for
instance, three faces meeting each other rectangularly are possible
planes on the crystal, and will very frequently be found actually
developed; such would obviously be chosen as the axial planes. The edges
of the cube, or of the tetragonal or rectangular rhombic prism, will be
the directions of the crystallographic axes in this case, and we can
imagine them moved parallel to themselves until the common centre of
intersection, the “origin” of the analytical geometrician, will occupy
the centre of the crystal, and the faces of the latter be built up
symmetrically about it. When the crystal is cubic, the three axes will
be of equal length as shown in Fig. 38; if tetragonal, the two
horizontal axes will be equal, but will differ in length from the
vertical axis, as represented in Fig. 39. If the crystal be rhombic, all
three axes will be of different lengths, as indicated in Fig. 40, which
represents the axes and axial planes of an actual rhombic substance,
topaz, for which the lateral axis _b_ and vertical axis _c_ are nearly
but not quite equal, while the front-and-back axis _a_ is very
different.
When the crystal is of monoclinic symmetry, as in Fig. 41, three axes
will similarly be found as the intersection of three principal parallel
pairs of faces, but two of them will be inclined at an angle other than
90° to each other, while the third, the lateral one in Fig. 41, will be
at right angles to those first two and to the plane containing them;
moreover, all three are unequal in length. In the case of a triclinic
crystal, shown in Fig. 42, however, there can be no right angles, and
the intersections of three important faces meeting each other at angles
as near 90° as possible are chosen as the axes, regard being had to both
factors of approximation to rectangularity and importance of
development. These triclinic axes are the most general type of crystal
axes, for not only are the angles not right angles, but the lengths of
the axes are also unequal.
[Illustration:
FIG. 40.—Axial Planes of a Rhombic Crystal.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 41.—Axial Planes of a Monoclinic Crystal.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 42.—Axial Planes of a Triclinic Crystal.
]
[Illustration:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account