We are now, therefore, in a position to approach the question of true
isomorphism, and as leading up to the fuller treatment of the subject in
Chapter X. we may conclude this chapter by referring first to one
important investigation in which the necessity for extreme accuracy of
measurement and perfection of material was fully appreciated. This was
an admirable research carried out in the years 1887 and 1888 by H. A.
Miers[10] on the red silver minerals, proustite, sulpharsenite of
silver, Ag_{3}AsS_{3}, and pyrargyrite, the analogous sulphantimonite of
silver, Ag_{3}SbS_{3}, which afforded a further indication of the
existence of real small differences of angle between the members of
truly isomorphous series. These two minerals form exceptionally
beautiful crystals belonging to the trigonal system, the hexagonal prism
being always a prominent form, terminated by the primary and other
rhombohedra, scalenohedra and various pyramidal forms, many of the
crystals being exceedingly rich in faces. When the crystals are freshly
obtained from the dark recesses of the silver mine they are very
lustrous and transparent, but they are gradually affected by light, like
many silver compounds, and require to be stored in the dark in order to
preserve their transparency. A magnificent crystal of proustite from
Chili is one of the finest objects in the British Museum at South
Kensington, but is rarely seen on account of the necessity for
preservation from light. Pyrargyrite is generally dark grey in
appearance, and affords a reddish-purple “streak” (colour of the powder
on scratching or pulverising). Proustite, however, possesses a beautiful
scarlet-vermilion colour, and affords a very bright red streak.
Now these two beautiful minerals are obviously analogous compounds of
the same metal, silver, with the sulpho-acid of two elements, arsenic
and antimony, belonging strictly to the same family group, the
nitrogen-phosphorus group, of the periodic classification of the
elements according to Mendeleéff. Consequently, they should be perfectly
isomorphous. Miers has shown in a most complete manner that they are so,
that they occur in very perfect crystals of similar habit belonging to
the same class of the trigonal system, the ditrigonal polar class, both
minerals being hemimorphic, that is, showing different forms at the two
terminations, in accordance with the symmetry of the polar class of the
trigonal system. But the angles of the two substances were not found to
be identical, although constant for each compound within one minute of
arc, there being slight but very real differences, which are very well
typified by the principal angle in each case, that of the primary
rhombohedron. In the case of proustite it is 72° 12′, while the
rhombohedron angle of pyrargyrite is 71° 22′.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account