Of all the bête, clumsy, blundering, boggling, baboon-headed stuff
I ever saw on a human stage that thing last night--as far as the
story and acting went--and of all the affected, sapless, soul-less,
beginningless, endless, topless, bottomless, topsiturviest,
tuneless, scrannelpipiest, tongs and boniest doggerel of sounds I
ever endured the deadliness of, that eternity of nothing was the
deadliest as far as its sound went. I never was so relieved, so far
as I can remember, in my life by the stopping of any sound, not
excepting railroad whistles, as I was by the cessation of the
cobbler’s bellowing; even the serenader’s caricatured twangle was a
rest after. As for the great “Lied,” I never made out where it
began or where it ended except by the fellow’s coming off the horse
block.
From which the inference is not unwarranted that Wagner did not please
Ruskin!
* * * * *
Opposed to all movements in art and life is the _academic_ mind, fed on
learning, steeped in tradition, hence conservative.
The term is not here used in a reproachful sense; on the contrary, the
philosopher lays stress upon the value of the academic in progress; it
is the element that preserves; it is the mass upon which humanity rests;
it is the old and stable; it is the past upon which the future is built;
it is the essential groundwork of new thought and new effort.
* * * * *
The life of the individual passes from the enthusiasms, the radicalisms
of youth to the serene and self-satisfied outlook of old age which
instinctively opposes novelty and change--the academic attitude.
Youth makes friends with every chance acquaintance, age shuns the
strange.
We are all Impressionists and Futurists at some times in our lives, but
we tend to petrify. Sclerosis of the _arteries_ is bad, but nothing
compared with sclerosis of the _emotions_. We not only tend to become
petrified as we grow older, but even in our youth we have our petrified
sides, our hard spots.
However progressive we may be in certain directions we are sure to be
stubbornly conservative in others.
The man who laughs at a cubist picture may be a cubist--that is, an
innovator--in his profession or business.
The man who is a conservative in religion may be a radical in politics,
and _vice versa_. As a matter of fact most of the followers of Lloyd
George in England are the greatest sticklers for the inerrancy and the
literal interpretation of the Scriptures, while most of the hide-bound
conservatives are exceedingly tolerant toward “modernism” and “higher
criticism” in the church.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account