The same question rises to the lips of every observer: How can they
possibly have been brought into such a situation? The marvel does not
grow less when we know that, instead of being closely compacted, the
stars of the cluster are probably separated by millions of miles; for
we know that their distances apart are slight as compared with their
remoteness from the Earth. Sir William Herschel estimated their number
to be about fourteen thousand, but in fact they are uncountable. If we
could view them from a point just within the edge of the assemblage,
they would offer the appearance of a hollow hemisphere emblazoned with
stars of astonishing brilliancy; the near-by ones unparalleled in
splendor by any celestial object known to us, while the more distant
ones would resemble ordinary stars. An inhabitant of the cluster would
not know, except by a process of ratiocination, that he was dwelling in
a globular assemblage of suns; only from a point far outside would
their spherical arrangement become evident to the eye. Imagine
fourteen-thousand fire-balloons with an approach to regularity in a
spherical space—say, ten miles in diameter; there would be an average
of less than thirty in every cubic mile, and it would be necessary to
go to a considerable distance in order to see them as a globular
aggregation; yet from a point sufficiently far away they would blend
into a glowing ball.
[Illustration: Star-cluster in Hercules
(Photographed with a two-foot reflector)]
Photographs show even better than the best telescopic views that the
great cluster is surrounded with a multitude of dispersed stars,
suggestively arrayed in more or less curving lines, which radiate from
the principle mass, with which their connection is manifest. These
stars, situated outside the central sphere, look somewhat like vagrant
bees buzzing round a dense swarm where the queen bee is sitting. Yet
while there is so much to suggest the operation of central forces,
bringing and keeping the members of the cluster together, the attentive
observer is also impressed with the idea that the whole wonderful
phenomenon may be _the result of explosion._ As soon as this thought
seizes the mind, confirmation of it seems to be found in the appearance
of the outlying stars, which could be as readily explained by the
supposition that they have been blown apart as that they have flocked
together toward a center. The probable fact that the stars constituting
the cluster are very much smaller than our sun might be regarded as
favoring the hypothesis of an explosion. Of their real size we know
nothing, but, on the basis of an uncertain estimate of their parallax,
it has been calculated that they may average forty-five thousand miles
in diameter—something more than half the diameter of the planet
Jupiter. Assuming the same mean density, fourteen thousand such stars
might have been formed by the explosion of a body about twice the size
of the sun.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account