Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages — John Shaqi
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
An article showing that this subject is not devoid of interest or
obsolete is given below from the _Bicycling World_, in which I think
the law of whirling bodies will apply. “The Rochester wheelmen debated
the question, ‘Why does a bicycle stand up while rolling and fall down
as soon as onward motion ceases?’ The answer decided to be correct
was, that ‘the bottom of the wheel can have no side motion because it
rests on the ground; and since the bottom is constantly becoming the
top and the top the bottom, if the upper part of the wheel gets any
lateral motion, it is checked by being brought round upon the ground
again before the motion has too much influence.’” I do not suppose
this ingenious decision, rendered by the high and mighty Solons of the
Rochester Club, was a serious one; however, we do find that just such
logic is quite common.
It is not plain whether the question discussed was that of a bicycle
with or without a man upon it, but I take it to be the latter. Some of
the gentlemen had no doubt noticed that to give the machine a shove
it would keep upright for a longer time running than when standing
unsupported. This is purely a case of the law that whirling things
tend to keep their own plane, as illustrated in the gyroscope and
the spinning top. In the running bicycle without a man upon it to
constantly rectify its position, the principle is simply one of the
parallelogram of rotations. If the wheel from any external force starts
to fall over, or, in other words, to revolve around a horizontal
line normal to its geometric axis, then, since the wheel is already
revolving about its axis in the axle, the resultant of these two
rotations will be a rotation about an axis inclined to the former axis
of the wheel, which means that the wheel will begin to circle around
a centre at some distance from the wheel on the side towards which
it starts to fall. This new axis about which the wheel revolves will
of course be in a plane perpendicular to the new plane of the wheel,
and will be inclined downward from the horizontal plane through its
centre, so that the wheel is no longer running in a vertical plane. The
rotation about the centre outside of the wheel, towards which centre
the wheel leans, brings into play a centrifugal force acting to upright
the wheel; that is, to bring it back to a vertical plane. Now, if the
wheel be run along a straight groove, so that circling around a centre
is prevented, then it will fall as quickly as when standing still; or
if, in the bicycle, the steering-wheel be locked so that it will not
turn out of the plane of the two wheels, there would be no uprighting
resultant, and the machine, according to Newton’s law of independent
forces, would fall.
SOME QUESTIONS OF POTENTIAL ENERGY, MOMENTUM, AND HILL-CLIMBING.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account