Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages — John Shaqi
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
When the short lines upon the curve are close together, it shows that
the saddle and rider are being checked proportionately as these lines
are less than one-eighth of an inch apart. On the other hand, when the
normal pace of the momentum of the heavier parts is slower than that of
the wheels, it is shown by the lines being more than an eighth of an
inch apart. In this case there is a tendency to increase the momentum
instead of decreasing it,—a state of affairs not so much to be deplored
if it were not evident that it is equally checked at some other point.
We know, in practice with the Ordinary, that the loss of momentum by
sudden checking can only happen to the full extent when the pace is
reasonably slow; should the momentum be too great it will simply refuse
to be interfered with in its forward course, and the rear wheel will
leave the ground with a result and in a manner quite well known.
In the safer forms of bicycles,—those from which a header is
improbable,—without proper springs, the rider will simply slide forward
on the saddle, causing considerable loss of momentum besides that due
to vibration, since he must afterwards slide himself back again.
Referring to the diagrams, Fig. 1 shows the Ordinary bicycle with a
fifty-two-inch front and an eighteen-inch rear wheel. The front wheel
mounts the obstacle with some difficulty, the curve upward being rather
sudden in its change of direction from the base line, thus showing that
the momentum is checked very rapidly; see the short vertical lines upon
the curves, which are about one-half the distance apart of those on the
base line between the curves and at the ends. Also notice that _F_ (the
front wheel) carries three-fourths of the weight, one curve being about
three times as high as the other.
Particular attention is called to the easy and gradual curve shown by
the mounting of the small rear wheel _R_; it would seem to show that
the great clamor of theorists for large rear wheels in the Ordinary
is somewhat unwarranted; the drop down and back in rolling off the
obstacle will be seen to be quite sudden, but notice not very much
more so than in Fig. 2, which shows the Rational, so called, with a
fifty-two-inch driver and twenty-four-inch rear wheel. The large rear
wheel affects the drop to some extent, but in all obstacles under four
inches in height there is no perceptible benefit derived, at least not
such as to warrant the extra weight and disarrangement of the steering.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account