Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
Much difficulty has been experienced by makers of lever cycles in
finding a suitable clutching device, a difficulty with which most
of the experience the writer has had is concerned. In conducting
experiments in this line I have found that the rattle of the old
ratchet was annoying, and it was quite a problem in my mind why makers
used them; but any one who undertakes to make a bicycle clutch will
soon discover the reason, though at what cost “deponent sayeth not.”
A neophyte in the bicycle experimenting ranks might justly suppose
that the matter of clutches is a well-developed art in mechanics; to a
certain extent it is, but not in the direction he will need. Clutches
may be divided into three classes,—first, the common ratchet and pawl,
either spring or gravity; second, the ratchet and friction pawl; third,
surface-friction clutches proper. The first two grip on corrugated
surfaces, the last on a perfectly plain or smooth surface. The first
class rattles according to the pressure on the pawl or the weight of
the same, and also to the amount of drop. The second class rattles
only under certain conditions; that is, when both ratchet and pawl are
in motion in the same direction, one moving a little faster than the
other. The third class is entirely noiseless. Let us pass over the
first class, as being familiar to everybody. The second class is not so
well known and has never been used in any of the arts in this country
so far as I know, except as recently applied to bicycles. This clutch
is very similar in appearance to a regular ratchet, the difference
being that in the former the pawl is held out of contact by friction
against some of the moving parts, and when the motion is reversed the
friction in a certain direction throws the pawl into action. A good
mechanic would have hardly conceded such an arrangement as practicable
in any machine, much less in a bicycle, for the reason that when the
motion is reversed the pawl plunges into the teeth with so much force
that damage would be supposed to result. Several patents are registered
in England upon the noiseless ratchet; they are all alike in general
principle, but it is due to the energy of an American maker that it has
been made a success in cycle construction, and I am inclined to think
it is the first time such a ratchet has ever been used to any extent in
any kind of machinery.
[Illustration: Noiseless ratchets.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account