D'Eon de Beaumont, his life and times : $b Compiled chiefly from unpublished papers and lettersHomberg, Octave
History
D'Eon de Beaumont, his life and times : $b Compiled chiefly from unpublished papers and letters
Homberg, Octave
Eon de Beaumont, Charles Geneviève Louis Auguste André Timothée d', 1728-1810
Sartine had, at first, shown himself flattered with the secret
unexpectedly entrusted to him; but it was not without misgivings that
he undertook a dangerous part which was equally incompatible with his
character and his office, and exposed him besides to the Duc de Praslin’s
resentment. Indeed, so diffident had the Comte de Broglie found him that,
in order to overcome his hesitation, he was obliged to reprimand him
twice and to assure him that he could not refuse the service the King
expected of him. Drouet’s papers were in consequence carefully sorted,
and only a few unimportant letters were left to be investigated. Though
the documents in question were now in safety there was still some fear of
indiscretion on the part of the two prisoners, and Louis XV. was obliged
to apply, directly and under the seal of secrecy, to M. de Jumilhac,
Governor of the Bastille, in order that he should allow Tercier to enter
the prison and communicate to Drouet and Hugonnet the depositions which
the Comte de Broglie “had been more than fifteen hours preparing.” So
well did each actor know his part, and so minutely was every detail
foreseen, that the comedy was a complete success. No clear sign of a
compromising correspondence could be traced, and de Praslin, who was
present at the investigation, was forced to accept a judgment by which
he was not really deceived. “I know well enough they are playing the
fool with me,” he said to de Sartine angrily, as he left the court. But,
conjecturing that he was running counter to a superior will, he resolved
to await events before reopening the case.
Drouet was released after a few days; but Hugonnet was left in the
Bastille, it being feared that too much indulgence would arouse
suspicions. During his detention, which lasted over two years and a half,
he lost all the savings of the calling whereby he had lived. In 1778 he
was reduced to poverty, and if he obtained some slight compensation it
was due entirely to the pressing appeals in his behalf which d’Eon made
to M. de Sartine.
This incident, which had created so many different impressions at
Versailles, had revived the hopes of revenge which de Guerchy nourished
against his adversary and de Broglie’s partisans, and the news of
this fresh defeat proved a bitter disappointment which increased the
ambassador’s ire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account