Frankly, therefore, Albrecht Dürer, who was born on May 21, 1471, is a
human being from another world, and unless you realise that too, I doubt
you can understand him, much less admire him.
For his Art is not beautiful.
Germans have never been able to create anything beautiful in Art: their
sense of beauty soars into Song.
But even whilst I am writing these words it occurs to me that they are
no longer true, for the German of to-day is no longer the German of
yesterday, "standing peaceful on his scientific watch-tower; and to the
raging, struggling multitude here and elsewhere solemnly, from hour to
hour, with preparatory blast of cow-horn emit his 'Höret ihr Herren und
lasst's euch sagen' ..." as Carlyle pictures him; he is most certainly
not like the Lutheran German with a child's heart and a boy's rash
courage.
Frankly I say you cannot admire Dürer if you be honestly ignorant or
ignorantly honest.
We of to-day are too level-headed; our brains cannot encompass the world
that crowded Dürer's dreams.
For the German's brain was always crowded; he had not that nice sense of
space and emptiness that makes Italian Art so pleasant to look upon, and
which the Japanese employ with astonishing subtlety. You remember
Wagner's words in Goethe's "Faust"--
"Zwar weiss ich viel; doch möcht ich Alles wissen."
(I know a lot, yet wish that I knew All.)
It is not only his eagerness to show you all he knows, but also his
ravenous desire to know all that is to be known. Hence we speak of
German thoroughness, at once his boast and his modesty.
Here again I have to pull up. Generalisations are so easy, appear so
justified, and are more often than not misleading.
Dürer was not a pure-blooded Teuton; his father came from Eytas in
Hungary.[1]
[1] Eytas translated into German is Thür (Door), and a
man from Thür a Thürer or Dürer.
That German music owes a debt of gratitude to Hungary is acknowledged.
Does Dürer owe his greatness to the strain of foreign blood?
Possibly; but it does not matter. He was a man, and a profound man,
therefore akin to all the world, as Dante and Michelangelo, as
Shakespeare and Millet. Born into German circumstances he appears in
German habit--that is all.
His father Albrecht was a goldsmith, and Albrecht the son having shown
himself worthy of a better education than his numerous brothers, was,
after finishing school, apprenticed to and would have remained a
goldsmith, had his artistic nature not drawn him to Art; at least so his
biographer, _i.e._ the painter himself, tells us. It was not the artist
alone who longed for freer play, for freer expression of his faculties.
It was to a great extent, I feel sure, the thinker.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account