Daily stories of Pennsylvania : $b prepared for publication in the leading daily newspapers of the state...Godcharles, Frederic Antes
History
Daily stories of Pennsylvania : $b prepared for publication in the leading daily newspapers of the state...
Godcharles, Frederic Antes
Pennsylvania -- Biography; Pennsylvania -- History
The provisions of the Constitution now require that no removal can
hereafter be made without the consent of the people at a general
election, and, although there have been many attempts made to relocate
at Philadelphia and elsewhere since 1812, it is hardly probable that any
other city or section will ever be acceptable to the citizens.
It appears the choice of Lancaster was not as satisfactory as expected
as agitation for another removal was almost immediately commenced. On
December 9, 1801, a motion was made by Stacy Potts, of Dauphin County,
seconded by Mr. Lord Butler, of Luzerne County, calling for the
appointment of a committee to consider and report on “the most eligible
place to fix the permanent seat of government of this State.” The House
voted to consider the report, January 13, 1802, but nothing further was
done during that session, except an attempt to introduce the measure
under a fresh dress. A measure was introduced for the erection of a
structure for the “safe preservation” of the State papers. Under this
thin disguise, the subject of removal was very skillfully avoided by
those opposed to removal in a debate extending through December, 1802,
and ending latter part of the following January.
Senator Laird, January 4, 1809, presented the petition of sundry
inhabitants of the town of Northumberland, at the forks of the
Susquehanna, setting forth the central situation of that growing town,
and showing the advantages of fixing the State government there,
offering accommodations for the officers of the State and members of the
Legislature, and praying a removal of the seat of government thither.
This petition was referred to a committee consisting of Senators Laird,
Heston, Doty, Hiester and Laycock.
The committee shortly after submitted a report recommending the removal
of the seat of government to the town of Northumberland. The Senate,
however, when the report was under consideration, struck out the word
“Northumberland,” and from that moment onward the subject was constantly
agitated.
On February 17, 1809, the Senate, in Committee of the Whole, endeavored
to have the words “City of Philadelphia,” inserted as the place for the
seat of government, but, on vote, the motion was lost when only eight
Senators supported the motion. Then another effort to insert the name of
Northumberland was made, also Middletown, and Harrisburg. Northumberland
received only seven votes, but when Harrisburg was voted upon the Senate
supported it by a vote of fourteen to ten, but the House refused to
consider the bill during that session. No further action was taken until
February, 1810, when a bill passed both branches of the Legislature and
became a law, February 21, 1810.
This act consisted of ten sections and provided “that within the month
of October, 1812, all the offices attached to the seat of government of
this State shall be removed to the Borough of Harrisburg,” etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account