Daily stories of Pennsylvania : $b prepared for publication in the leading daily newspapers of the state...Godcharles, Frederic Antes
History
Daily stories of Pennsylvania : $b prepared for publication in the leading daily newspapers of the state...
Godcharles, Frederic Antes
Pennsylvania -- Biography; Pennsylvania -- History
Then the Constitution of 1776 had been rather hastily prepared amid
great excitement and was adopted with the determined spirit that
characterized all public measures during the Revolutionary period.
Even though the instrument had become somewhat antiquated, it might have
been improved by regular methods, and the amended Constitution would
have been acceptable to a large number of people, but such action would
not have served the personal ambitions of the leaders.
The chief objections to the Constitution were the single legislative
body, and a Council of Censors whose functions were of such an unusual
character, the latter body being the real bone of contention.
When the people had grown discontented with the old Constitution,
believing they had suffered long enough through lack of action and
authority, they were willing to adopt another Constitution containing
the principles of enduring life.
The same movement that led to the ratification of the Federal
Constitution by Pennsylvania stirred the waters in another direction. If
the Federal Constitution could be ratified by a convention, why could
not a convention be called to make and adopt another Constitution for
Pennsylvania?
A petition was addressed to the Legislature, which adopted a resolution
March 24, 1789, but the Supreme Executive Council refused to promulgate
this action of the Assembly.
September 15, 1789, the Assembly adopted another resolution calling for
a convention by a vote of 39 to 17.
At the election in October delegates were chosen, and on Tuesday,
November 24, 1789, the convention assembled in Philadelphia, but a
quorum not being present, the organization was effected the following
day with sixty-four delegates in attendance. No returns had been
received from the counties of Northumberland and Allegheny, and Mifflin
had sent a double delegation.
Thomas Mifflin was chosen president; Joseph Redman, secretary; Frederick
Snyder, messenger, and Joseph Fry, doorkeeper.
On the Republican side, those in favor of a new constitution were James
Wilson, Thomas McKean and Thomas Mifflin, all of Philadelphia; Timothy
Pickering, of Luzerne; Edward Hand, of Lancaster. Among the
Constitutionalists were William Findley, of Westmoreland; John Smilie
and Albert Gallatin, of Fayette; Robert Whitehill and William Irvine, of
Cumberland.
After a long session the convention adjourned Friday, February 26, 1790,
to meet Monday, August 9.
The second session of the convention met pursuant to adjournment and got
down to business the third day, and concluded its work by the final
adoption of a new instrument September 2, 1790, the final vote being
sixty-one to one, Mr. George Roberts, of Philadelphia, voting against
its adoption.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account