------------------------------------------------------------------------
[322]
“And in the Galaxy this heaven has a close
resemblance to Metaphysics. Wherefore it must be
known that the Philosophers have had different
opinions about this Galaxy. For the Pythagoreans
affirmed that the sun at one time wandered in its
course, and in passing through other regions not
suited to sustain its heat, set on fire the place
through which it passed; and so these traces of the
conflagration remain there. And I believe that they
were influenced by the fable of Phaëton, which Ovid
tells at the beginning of the second book of the
_Metamorphoses_. Others (as for instance Anaxagoras
and Democritus) said that the Galaxy was the light
of the sun reflected in that region. And these
opinions they confirmed by demonstrative reasons.
What Aristotle may have said about it cannot be
accurately known, because the two translations give
different accounts of his opinion. And I think that
any mistake may have been due to the translators,
for in the _New Translation_ he is made to say
that the Galaxy is a congregation, under the stars
of this part of the heaven, of the vapours which
are always being attracted by them; and this
opinion does not appear to be right. In the _Old
Translation_ he says that the Galaxy is nothing but
a multitude of fixed stars in that region, stars
so small that they are not separately visible from
our earth, but the appearance of whiteness which
we call the Galaxy is due to them. [And it may be
that the heaven in that part is more dense, and
therefore retains and reproduces that light] and
this opinion Avicenna and Ptolemy appear to share
with Aristotle. Therefore, since the Galaxy is an
effect of those stars which cannot be perceived
except so far as we apprehend these things by
their effect, and since Metaphysics treats of
primal substances which in the same way we cannot
apprehend except by their effects, it is plain that
there is a close resemblance between the starry
heaven and Metaphysics.”
_Conv._ II. xv. 44-86. (_Jackson_).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account