Take first the one passage in which he explicitly states the day and year, the words of Malacoda quoted above. This is usually taken to indicate the year 1300, as shown above (p. 410), but it is easy to interpret it another way—thus: 1300 years had been completed since the Nativity on the day Dante entered the Inferno. Now the year 1 is not one year after the Nativity, but the year of the Nativity itself; hence the year 2 is one year after, the year 3 two years after, ... the year 1300 is 1299 years after, and the year 1301 is 1300 years after. The year 1300 was completed on March 25,[536] and the date then changed, according to Florentine usage, to 1301. (It had already been called 1301 for three months, according to Roman usage, so fortunately for us, there is no disagreement between the two calendars from this part of the year). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [536] Exactly at midday, moreover, according to one system then in vogue, though it seems to have been more usual to begin the day at sunrise. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ It must also be noted that in several old MSS., considered authoritative by some of the very early commentators, the passage reads:—“Mille dugent _’uno_ con sessanta sei.”[537] Although it is impossible to believe that Dante wrote such a faulty line, this shows that some early copyist felt a difficulty either in accepting the date 1300 or in understanding how Dante arrived at it by Malacoda’s computations. This passage, therefore, is inconclusive for 1300 or 1301. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [537] “A thousand two hundred _and one_, added to sixty-six.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------