Hipparchus was able to construct a satisfactory theory of the sun
and to some extent of the moon, but he found more irregularities in
the planetary motions than Eudoxus had suspected. The records of his
predecessors were not accurate enough for him to construct a theory
for the planets, and he soon realized that one life-time would not be
long enough to collect all the data necessary, so, as Ptolemy tells us,
“Hipparchus, who loved truth above all things,” quietly set to work to
make as good and as many observations as possible, leaving it to his
successors to complete and explain them.
In the same spirit he undertook the laborious task, of which Pliny
speaks with awe as a presumptuous scheme, even for a god, “_rem etiam
Deo improbam_,” of numbering the stars. Pliny says he was led to do
this by the appearance of a New Star, which blazed out suddenly in
the constellation of Scorpio in b.c. 136, just as Nova Persei did in
Perseus in February 1901. He saw that even in the upper regions of the
eternal heavens, which Aristotle had supposed absolutely changeless,
changes may occur, and in order that even the least of these should
not pass unnoticed, he set to work to note the number, brightness,
and position of all he could see. This great catalogue of 1080 stars,
copied by Ptolemy in his _Almagest_, was the basis for all succeeding
catalogues, from Spain to Turkestan, until quite modern times. In it,
for the first time, the places of the stars were not merely described
according to their position in the constellation figures, but were
noted in degrees on the sphere, as is done to-day.
[Sidenote: Timocharis _c._ B.C. 280.]
One day, when comparing his notes with those of Timocharis, who had
worked at Alexandria about a century and a half earlier, he found that
the brilliant star Spica, the Ear-of-Corn which the Virgin carries
in her hand, had apparently moved nearer to the autumnal equinox by
about 2°. (Two degrees is about four times the angular diameter of the
sun). Of course he or Timocharis might have made a mistake, or Spica
might really be moving among the stars, or she might be carried along
with the rest by a slow movement of the whole star sphere. Apparently
Hipparchus satisfied himself that he could rely upon Timocharis’
observation, and took pains to verify his own; the second hypothesis
could be disproved by the fact that Spica does not change her place
perceptibly among her neighbours; and finally it became clear that her
motion is part of a slow apparent movement of the whole heavens.
[Illustration: Fig. 24. The movement of Spica.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account