Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 2 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Heredity and UtilityRomanes, George John
Science
Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 2 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Heredity and Utility
Romanes, George John
Evolution (Biology); Heredity
Many of our domesticated dogs, when we gently scratch their sides and
certain other parts of the body, will themselves perform scratching
movements with the hind leg of the same side as that upon which the
irritation is being supplied. According to Goltz[46], this action is a
true reflex; for he found that it is performed equally well in a dog
which has been deprived of its cerebral hemispheres, and therefore of
its normal volition. Again, according to Haycraft[47], this reflex is
congenital, or not acquired during the life-time of each individual dog.
Now, although the action of scratching is doubtless adaptive, it appears
to me incredible that it could ever have become organized into a
congenital reflex by natural selection. For, in order that it should,
the scratching away fleas would require to have been a function of
selective value. Yet, even if the irritation caused by fleas were
supposed to be so far fatal in the struggle for existence, it is certain
that they would always be scratched away by the conscious intelligence
of each individual dog; and, therefore, that no advantage could be
gained by organizing the action into a reflex. On the other hand, if
acquired characters are ever in any degree transmitted, it is easy to
understand how so frequently repeated an action should have become, in
numberless generations of dogs, congenitally automatic.
[46] _Pflüger's Archiv_, Bd. xx. s. 23 (1879).
[47] _Brain_, part xlviii, pp. 516-19 (1889).--There is still better
proof of this in the case of certain rodents. For instance,
observing that rats and mice are under the necessity of very
frequently scratching themselves with their hind-feet, I tried
the experiment of removing the latter from newly-born
individuals--i.e. before the animals were able to co-ordinate
their movements, and therefore before they had ever even
attempted to scratch themselves. Notwithstanding that they were
thus destitute of individual experience with regard to the
benefit of scratching, they began their scratching movements
with their stumps as soon as they were capable of executing
co-ordinated movements, and afterwards continued to do so till
the end of their lives with as much vigour and frequency as
unmutilated animals. Although the stumps could not reach the
seats of irritation which were bent towards them, they used to
move rapidly in the air for a time sufficient to have given the
itching part a good scratch, had the feet been present--after
which the animals would resume their sundry other avocations
with apparent satisfaction. These facts showed the hereditary
response to irritation by parasites to be so strong, that even
a whole life-time's experience of its futility made no
difference in the frequency or the vigour thereof.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account