Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles DarwinDarwin, Charles
Science
Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles Darwin
Darwin, Charles
Evolution (Biology)
[The Effects
of Cross
and Self
Fertilization
in the
Vegetable
Kingdom,
page 443.]
There are two important conclusions which may be deduced from my
observations: 1. That the advantages of cross-fertilization do not
follow from some mysterious virtue in the mere union of two distinct
individuals, but from such individuals having been subjected during
previous generations to different conditions, or to their having
varied in a manner commonly called spontaneous, so that in either case
their sexual elements have been in some degree differentiated; and, 2.
That the injury from self-fertilization follows from the want of such
differentiation in the sexual elements. These two propositions are
fully established by my experiments. Thus, when plants of the _Ipomœa_
and of the _Mimulus_, which had been self-fertilized for the seven
previous generations, and had been kept all the time under the same
conditions, were intercrossed one with another, the offspring did not
profit in the least by the cross.
* * * * *
[Page 451.]
The curious cases of plants which can fertilize and be fertilized by
any other individual of the same species, but are altogether sterile
with their own pollen, become intelligible, if the view here propounded
is correct, namely, that the individuals of the same species growing in
a state of nature near together have not really been subjected during
several previous generations to quite the same conditions.
POTENCY OF THE SEXUAL ELEMENTS IN PLANTS.
[Page 446.]
It is obvious that the exposure of two sets of plants during several
generations to different conditions can lead to no beneficial results,
as far as crossing is concerned, unless their sexual elements are
thus affected. That every organism is acted on to a certain extent by
a change in its environment will not, I presume, be disputed. It is
hardly necessary to advance evidence on this head; we can perceive the
difference between individual plants of the same species which have
grown in somewhat more shady or sunny, dry or damp places. Plants which
have been propagated for some generations under different climates or
at different seasons of the year transmit different constitutions to
their seedlings. Under such circumstances, the chemical constitution
of their fluids and the nature of their tissues are often modified.
Many other such facts could be adduced. In short, every alteration in
the function of a part is probably connected with some corresponding,
though often quite imperceptible, change in structure or composition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account