Darwinism. The Noachian Flood: A lecture delivered before the Torquay Natural History Society, Jan. 31st, 1870Stebbing, Thomas Roscoe Rede
Religion
Darwinism. The Noachian Flood: A lecture delivered before the Torquay Natural History Society, Jan. 31st, 1870
Stebbing, Thomas Roscoe Rede
Deluge; Evolution; Natural selection
Transcribed from the 1870 Macmillan and Co. edition by David Price.
DARWINISM.
* * * * *
THE NOACHIAN FLOOD.
A LECTURE
DELIVERED BEFORE
THE TORQUAY NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY,
JAN. 31ST, 1870,
* * * * *
BY
THOMAS R. R. STEBBING, M.A.,
_Late Fellow and Tutor of Worcester College_, _Oxford_.
* * * * *
London
MACMILLAN AND CO.
1870.
* * * * *
OXFORD:
BY T. COMBE, M.A., E. B. GARDNER, E. P. HALL, AND H. LATHAM, M.A.,
PRINTERS TO THE UNIVERSITY.
THE NOACHIAN FLOOD.
DARWINISM implies almost throughout that no universal Deluge has drowned
our globe, either within the last ten thousand years, or even within a
period indefinitely longer. Let us speak with due respect of the
contrary belief. It _seems_ to rest upon the testimony of a Volume the
most precious in the world. It was taken for granted till a few years
back as much in science as in religion. For a while, the arguments that
began to be raised against it were met by counter-arguments so plausible,
and the objectors differed so widely among themselves, that unscientific
opinion had a kind of right and prudence in adhering to that which had
been taught for centuries, and was still taught without deviation in
nursery, and school, and pulpit.
We should have asserted a better right and shown a higher prudence, had
we waited, in a matter which concerned science full as much as it
concerned religion, till, by learning facts and weighing arguments, we
had become able to form an opinion no longer unscientific, or, at the
very least, to appreciate the difficulties involved in the ancient
belief.
We are forced to take a controversy of this kind as it stands; otherwise,
there is a simple principle which ought to make all controversy on the
subject needless. All authors endowed with common sense, let alone
divine inspiration, use language which their intended readers may be
expected to understand, and language appropriate to the scope and design
of their writings. Unless, therefore, we suppose that the Old Testament
writers proposed to teach natural science to the Hebrew nation, we ought
to expect from them what we actually find: as to natural phenomena, past
and present, they use the language not of far-advanced knowledge and
minute particular research, but simply the language current in their own
day and nation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account