David Crockett : $b scout, small boy, pilgrim, mountaineer, soldier, bear-hunter, and Congressman, defender of the AlamoAllen, Charles Fletcher
History
David Crockett : $b scout, small boy, pilgrim, mountaineer, soldier, bear-hunter, and Congressman, defender of the Alamo
Allen, Charles Fletcher
Crockett, Davy, 1786-1836
Davy’s opposition to Andrew Jackson was outspoken and undisguised.
After his tour of the Eastern cities, to be hereinafter described, he
spoke in Congress upon the subject of the “Bill Making Appropriations
for Fortifications.” The records show that his words were in part as
follows:
“Sir, we have no Government but Andrew Jackson, without Secretaries;
and, sir, he is surrounded by a set of imps of famine that are as
hungry as the flies that we have read of in Æsop’s Fables, that came
after the fox and sucked his blood. Sir, they are a hungry swarm, and
will lick up every dollar of the public money.”
Mr. Dunlap, of Tennessee, replied to Crockett with heated language, and
Crockett again took the floor to reply, saying that he wished it to
be distinctly understood that he took back nothing that he had said,
but that he would reassert everything and go even further. Standing in
his place for almost the last time, he lifted his hand in passionate
protest against the proposed use of the public funds, and took his seat
with these words:
“We have no Government, no Government at all. God only knows what is
to become of the country in these days of misrule. Sir, I am done.”
Such attitude as this accounts for the infinite pains with which the
opposition fought him two years later in his campaign for a fourth
term. While he was attending to his Congressional duties, his political
fences were demolished by the stay-at-homes, and in their places were
set up what in these days of such unsightly nuisances might be called
the bill-boards of partisan defamation.
The comparatively inactive life of a Congressman had begun to tell
upon the scout and bear-hunter of the Mississippi cane. He decided to
take a trip through the Eastern States for the benefit of his health.
Although it was in the midst of the spring session of Congress, he
left Washington on the 25th of April, 1834, and did not return until
the latter part of June. He says of this proposed journey:
“During this session of Congress, I thought I would take a travel
through the Northern States. I had braved the lonely forests of the
West, I had shouldered the warrior’s rifle in the far South; but the
North and East I had never seen. I seemed to like members of Congress
who came from these parts, and wished to know what kind of constituents
they had.”
Up to this time his knowledge of the East was confined to Baltimore
and Washington. He had read and heard much of the wonders of the
greater cities of the Atlantic seaboard, but he had never felt free to
describe them to his fellow-citizens of western Tennessee. He has left
no word regarding his impressions of the nation’s capital. It would be
interesting to compare his views with those of Charles Dickens, who
visited many of the same cities a few years later. This is what Dickens
thought of Washington in 1842:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account