Daybreak in Turkey: Second EditionBarton, James L. (James Levi)
History
Daybreak in Turkey: Second Edition
Barton, James L. (James Levi)
Turkey
Under such circumstances it is not difficult to imagine the general
conditions of society and the deplorable life of the Church. These
conditions were more or less modified in the large coast cities like
Constantinople and Smyrna, but even in these places, while more
educated men were found than in the interior, there was dense ignorance
among the masses, and no provision for the education of girls. The
entire empire had few newspapers or periodicals of any kind in any
language, and the state of education stimulated the production of no
great literature, even had there been those capable of producing it.
The beginning of the nineteenth century, apart from the revival of
learning among the Greeks of the West, may be called the dark age for
literature, learning, and religion in the Turkish empire.
Constantinople and Syria were the two centers for Christian work in
Turkey among the Oriental churches, because these were the centers of
control for all of these churches. The chief patriarch resided at the
Porte and was in close touch with his majesty the sultan, while the
secondary patriarch resided at Jerusalem, cooperating with his superior
at the capital. These churches could best be reached and influenced for
evangelical Christianity from the same points.
Missionaries were sent to the ancient churches, not to attack them
either in their doctrines or in their practises, but to cooperate with
their leaders in organizing a system of education and in creating a
sentiment that should demand for the Church an educated and morally
upright clergy. It was expected that the Church would accept the
modern version of its own Scriptures and encourage its circulation
among the people. For the best conduct of a work of this character,
the missionaries needed to be in close contact with the centers of
ecclesiastical power in all of these churches, that from them the
ordinary lines of communication might be utilized in reaching the
remote interior districts.
In order that misunderstandings may be cleared up, it should be stated
here that missionaries to the Armenians and Greeks were not sent
to divide the churches or to separate out those who should accept
education and read the Bible in the vernacular. Their one supreme
endeavor was to help the Armenians and Greeks work out a quiet but
genuine reform in their respective churches. The missionaries made no
attacks upon the churches, their customs, or beliefs, but strove by
positive, quiet effort to show the leaders how much they lacked and to
help them bring about the necessary changes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account