Days and Nights in London; Or, Studies in Black and GrayRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
History
Days and Nights in London; Or, Studies in Black and Gray
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
London (England) -- Social conditions; London (England) -- Social life and customs
In spite of the somewhat extreme notions of the “Friends,” who seem to
forget that men are driven into cities by the necessity which compels
most of them to earn their daily bread, it must be admitted that in the
question of air they have hit a blot. The first article of food, namely,
fresh air, is that which is least under the command of man. Mr.
Milverton says there is no danger of London being starved for want of
animal food. There is more and more danger every year of its health
being diminished from the want of a supply of fresh air. It is stated,
in confirmation of this fact, that every year the hospital surgeons in
London find it more difficult to cure wounds and injuries of all kinds to
the human body, on account, it is supposed, of the growing impurity of
the London air. This bad air kills off the cows. A London cow does not
last a third part of the time one does in the country. On this head much
more might have been said. The author might have referred to the
mournful fate of the fine cattle, who, recently, on the field of their
triumph, the Smithfield Club Show, found, not laurels and rewards, but a
grave, in consequence of the fog. We read that that famous man, Count
Rumford, used to estimate the number of millions of chaldrons of coals
which were suspended in the atmosphere of London, and to dwell upon the
mischief which was caused to furniture by the smoke when it descended.
But there are other special causes of injury, such as dust and chemical
emanations of all kinds. The result is that everything in such a city as
London soon loses all bloom and freshness, and, indeed, is rapidly
deteriorated. The more beautiful the thing, the more swift and fatal is
this deterioration. The essayist calculates the injury of property in
London, caused, not by reasonable wear and tear, but by the result of the
agglomeration of too many people upon one spot of ground, as not less
than three or four millions of pounds per annum. It is to be feared the
estimate is not exaggerated.
There is a further illustration. Sir Rutherford Alcock, as we all know,
represented our interests in China. While there he visited the Chinese
Wall, and brought back two specimens from it in the way of bricks. These
bricks must have been many centuries old, but they had kept their form
and betrayed no signs of decay in that atmosphere. Sir Rutherford put
these two bricks out in the balcony of his house in London. This was
about two years ago. One of these bricks has already gone to pieces,
being entirely disintegrated by the corrosive influence of the London
atmosphere.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account