Bible -- Antiquities; Bible. Old Testament -- Evidences, authority, etc.
The earlier archeologists fell into this trap, and consequently erected
an antiquity phantom which obscured the problem of chronology for some
considerable time. When it was discovered that these dynasties were
concurrent, a great deal of the fallacious antiquity of Egypt was
abandoned. This fictional antiquity, which doubled the factor of time
for that period, had been used to discredit the text of the Bible by the
critical scholars, so-called. Now, in the light of our present learning,
we find no discrepancy between the antiquity of Egypt, properly
understood, and the chronology of the Scripture, when it is divorced
from the errors of Ussher. Incidentally, the chronology and antiquity
demands of both archeology and revelation coincide beautifully with the
demands of sane anthropology.
To delineate this background so necessary to the proper understanding of
the record of the pharaohs, it is necessary to introduce the first
occasion of the coincidence of the text of the Scripture with the land
and the people of Egypt, as it is here that the streams of revelation
and history begin to converge. This beginning is made, of course, in the
flight of Abraham into Egypt at the time of a disastrous famine.
Overlooking for the moment the reprehensible conduct of Abraham
concerning the denial of his wife Sarah, and the consequent
embarrassment of the pharaoh, we digress to make a brief survey of the
incidents that lead up to the kindness of Pharaoh to Abraham.
There had been previous Semitic invasions of Egypt. The first reason for
these forays, of course, was famine. Due to the unfailing inundation by
the river Nile, the fertile land of Egypt was a natural storehouse. The
land of Egypt is fertile, the sun is benevolent, and wherever water
reaches the land, amazingly prodigious crops are the inevitable result.
So in the ancient days, whenever there was drought in the desert
countries surrounding Egypt, the hungry hordes looked on the food
supplies of their neighboring country, and, naturally, moved in that
direction. Thus the pressure of want was the primary reason for these
early Semitic invasions.
The secondary cause was conquest. These people of antiquity were brutal
pragmatists, as are certain nations in our present Twentieth Century.
The theme song of antiquity undoubtedly was, “I came, I saw, I
conquered.” The motive for living in those stern days seems to have
been, “He takes who can, and keeps who may.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account