Bible -- Antiquities; Bible. Old Testament -- Evidences, authority, etc.
Even before sin had reared its ugly head, to shatter the sweet communion
and spoil the fair harmony that was the basis of man’s fellowship with
his Creator, this error appeared. It was Satan who, encroaching upon the
beauty of Eden’s fair content, first said, “Hath God said?” The denial
of the truth of God’s spoken word originated with the enemy of man: and
it would behoove us all to remember that any man who has questioned His
written word from that hour to this, is also an enemy, and an emissary
of the original foe of mankind! Do we owe Satan so great a debt of
gratitude for the deep and dark pit of woe into which he has lured our
race, that we must lend slavish attention to the same old error when he
sponsors it today?
For this “modern” attempt to discredit the Scripture is but a
recrudescence of his ancient and simple strategy for the hurt of
mankind. Well does he know that if he can but shake the faith of our
generation in the integrity of the Bible, faith in God must soon be lost
as well. Once more pedantic scoffers, professors of this and of that,
arise solemnly to refute the truth of the only “map” that can ever guide
men back to the Paradise we lost when the first man rejected God’s
revelation.
It is interesting to see that this old error is in no new guise, in the
article referred to above. This is nothing new, it is just an original
approach to the same old mess of Satanic whispering. Indeed, Paul warned
us of the possibility of this very article and method in II Timothy 3:8,
when he said:
Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the
truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.
He introduces the very age of Egyptian history, and the events connected
with the Exodus in speaking thus of the false teachers of the apostate
days that should precede the time of our Lord’s return. And lo! the
event transpires in this year of grace, as the press of the twentieth
century casts doubt upon the Ten Plagues in this subtle manner.
It _is_ subtle. Also dishonest to the nth degree. Professing to accept
the historicity of the events, the article then proceeds to demolish the
credibility of the record, by ascribing all the plagues to natural
forces, directed by the genius of a human being, namely, Moses. God is
ruled out, the supernatural denied, and common sense prostituted to
infidelity in a manner that the shallowest thinker could not
countenance. For a man of medicine, or a scholar in any realm of
science, to foster such a contemptible evasion of plain fact, passes
understanding.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account