Bible -- Antiquities; Bible. Old Testament -- Evidences, authority, etc.
One of the greatest difficulties that has always faced the students of
antiquity was the construction of an accurate and detailed chronology.
The early Egyptians paid no attention whatever to chronological
sequence, but dated the episodes and events which they recorded by the
year of the contemporary monarch. Among the Chaldeans and the Sumerians,
however, lists of eponyms were carefully kept. In the Assyrian meaning
of this word an eponym was an official whose name was used in a
chronological system to designate a certain year of office. From these
consecutive records of the eponyms, king-lists of unusual and detailed
accuracy were compiled. A great deal of the difficulty in harmonizing
the chronological factors in the study of antiquity has recently been
solved by a close study of these canons, which studies were first begun
by Sir Henry Rawlinson. As an instance, we note that one such
consecutive list gives all of the eponyms from B. C. 893 to 666.
Another magnificent aid to the Biblical chronologist is found in the
astronomical data which were so carefully kept at the same historical
period. Through these credible records we have the material to check the
accuracy of the king-lists that adds to their tremendous value. For
instance, a tablet has come to us stating that in the eponym of one
Pur-sagali, there was an eclipse of the sun which took place in the
month Sivan. Since Sivan would be composed, according to our calendar,
of the last two weeks of May and the first two weeks of June, it is easy
to make an astronomical calculation to fix this date. We are delighted
to find that there was an eclipse of the sun which would have been
visible at Nineveh on June 15, 763 B. C. With this factor fixed, we can
now date all of the events of that period of antiquity from these
king-lists to the time of the beginning of the reign of Assur-bani-pal.
Another such tablet, which came from Babylon, gives us an opportunity to
check back the other way. This tablet merely states, “In the seventh
year of the reign of Cambyses, between the 16th and 17th of the month
Phemenoth, at one hour before midnight, the moon was obscured in the
vicinity of Babylon by one-half of her diameter on the north.” We then
turn to our modern astronomical sources and learn from them that there
_was_ just such an eclipse of the moon which would have been visible in
Babylon in the year 522 B. C. Since this was the seventh year of
Cambyses, it follows that he must have ascended in the year 529.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account