Deadly Adulteration and Slow Poisoning Unmasked: Disease and Death in the Pot and BottleAnonymous
Science
Deadly Adulteration and Slow Poisoning Unmasked: Disease and Death in the Pot and Bottle
Anonymous
Drug adulteration; Food adulteration and inspection
But supposing, dear Bull, that all the above “horrid array” of
poisoning and stupefying ingredients was “mere fudge,” and that you
should have the fortune to deal with a brewer and publican, who have
the “fear of the Lord” before their eyes, and who “wax strong in well
doing,” recollect that the present manufactured “_entire_ beer” of the
most _honest_ trading brewer alive is a very heterogeneous mixture—a
composition of all the waste and spoiled beer of the publicans, the
bottoms of their butts—the leavings of their pots—the drippings of
their machines for drawing the beer—the remnants of beer that lay
in the leaden pipes of the brewery, with a portion of brown stout,
bottling beer, and mild beer. So admits that “paragon of brewers,”
Mr. Barclay. (See Parliamentary Minutes, p. 94.) Surely, John, it
is not courteous and loving treatment of thy “better half” and her
“dutiful daughters” to expect them to sully their delicate throttles
with the leavings and hawkings of some bearish beast of a coal-heaver
or a night-man! This, friend John, is one of the “indicia” of the
necessity of thy cultivating the clean and wholesome “home brewery” of
thy forefathers; and in the promotion of this laudable and necessary
undertaking I hope I shall be able to assist thee in my projected
work, “THE FAMILY BREWING ORACLE,” and that, by its means, thou wilt
be enabled to drink a wholesome and nourishing beverage, either ale or
porter, at the trifling cost of from five farthings to three halfpence
per pot, after the tasting of which thou wilt never allow a drop of
brewers’ or public-house porter, or intermediate beer, or any other
vile or new-fangled substitution for the home-brewed liquor of thy
ancestors, to enter thy chaps.
But, in your honest sincerity and “usually naive manner,” you will
exclaim “but we have methods and tests for detecting the adulteration
of our native liquor—our vinum Britannicum—our own Sir John Barlycorn.”
Aye, have you, Old Gentleman! then I give you joy of your discovery,
and hope thou wilt put it into constant practice every day of thy
life before thou takest a sup of the delectable and heart-cheering
composition. But, for my part, John, give me leave to say that I have
always understood that the detection of the adulteration of beer with
vegetable substances deleterious to health is extremely difficult, if
not beyond the reach of chemical agency or analysis; and in most cases,
particularly where cocculus indicus, or its extract, has been used,
quite impossible. The tests for ascertaining the admixture of sulphuric
acid are more determinate, and are ably detailed in Mr. Accum’s work,
p. 193.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account