Decadence: Henry Sidgwick memorial lecture, 1908Balfour, Arthur James
Philosophy
Decadence: Henry Sidgwick memorial lecture, 1908
Balfour, Arthur James
Nationalism; Political science
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE,
C. F. CLAY, MANAGER.
London: FETTER LANE, E.C.
Glasgow: 50, WELLINGTON STREET.
[Illustration]
Leipzig: F. A. BROCKHAUS.
New York: G. P. PUTNAM’S SONS.
Bombay and Calcutta: MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD.
[_All Rights reserved_]
DECADENCE
_HENRY SIDGWICK MEMORIAL
LECTURE_
by
THE RIGHT HON.
ARTHUR JAMES BALFOUR, M.P.
[DELIVERED AT NEWNHAM COLLEGE,
JANUARY 25, 1908]
CAMBRIDGE
at the University Press
1908
Cambridge:
PRINTED BY JOHN CLAY, M.A.
AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
DECADENCE.
I must begin what I have to say with a warning and an apology. I must
warn you that the present essay makes no pretence to be an adequate
treatment of some compact and limited theme; but rather resembles those
wandering trains of thought, where we allow ourselves the luxury of
putting wide-ranging questions, to which our ignorance forbids any
confident reply. I apologise for adopting a course which thus departs
in some measure from familiar precedent. I admit its perils. But it is
just possible that when a subject, or group of subjects, is of great
inherent interest, even a tentative, and interrogative, treatment of it
may be worth attempting.
My subject, or at least my point of departure, is Decadence. I do
not mean the sort of decadence often attributed to certain phases of
artistic or literary development, in which an overwrought technique,
straining to express sentiments too subtle or too morbid, is deemed to
have supplanted the direct inspiration of an earlier and a simpler age.
Whether these autumnal glories, these splendours touched with death,
are recurring phenomena in the literary cycle: whether, if they be,
they are connected with other forms of decadence, may be questions well
worth asking and answering. But they are not the questions with which I
am at present concerned. The decadence respecting which I wish to put
questions is not literary or artistic, it is political and national.
It is the decadence which attacks, or is alleged to attack, great
communities and historic civilisations: which is to societies of men
what senility is to man, and is often, like senility, the precursor and
the cause of final dissolution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account