Decadence: Henry Sidgwick memorial lecture, 1908Balfour, Arthur James
Philosophy
Decadence: Henry Sidgwick memorial lecture, 1908
Balfour, Arthur James
Nationalism; Political science
The flexible element in any society, that which is susceptible of
progress or decadence, must therefore be looked for rather in the
physical and psychical conditions affecting the life of its component
units, than in their inherited constitution. This last rather supplies
a limit to variations than an element which does itself vary: though
from this point of view its importance is capital. I at least find
it quite impossible to believe that any attempt to provide widely
different races with an identical environment, political, religious,
educational, what you will, can ever make them alike. They have been
different and unequal since history began; different and unequal they
are destined to remain through future periods of comparable duration.
But though the advance of each community is thus limited by its
inherited aptitudes, I do not suppose that those limits have ever been
reached by its unaided efforts. In the cases where a forward movement
has died away, the pause must in part be due to arrested development
in the variable, not to a fixed resistance in the unchanging factor
of national character. Either external conditions are unfavourable;
or the sentiments, customs and beliefs which make society possible
have hardened into shapes which make its further self-development
impossible; or through mere weariness of spirit the community resigns
itself to a contented, or perhaps a discontented, stagnation; or it
shatters itself in pursuit of impossible ideals, or for other and
obscurer reasons, flags in its endeavours, and falls short of possible
achievement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account