Decadence: Henry Sidgwick memorial lecture, 1908Balfour, Arthur James
Philosophy
Decadence: Henry Sidgwick memorial lecture, 1908
Balfour, Arthur James
Nationalism; Political science
the Greek, the Illyrian, the Italian were all at home, and which,
though based on conquest, was accepted by the conquered as the natural
organisation of the civilised world.
Rome had thus unique sources of strength. What sources of weakness
would our observer be likely to detect behind her imposing exterior?
The diminution of population is the one which has (rightly I think)
most impressed historians: and it is difficult to resist the evidence,
either of the fact, or of its disastrous consequences. I hesitate
indeed to accept without qualification the accounts given us of the
progressive decay of the native Italian stock from the days of the
Gracchi to the disintegration of the Empire in the West: and when we
read how the dearth of men was made good (in so far as it was made
good) by the increasing inflow of slaves and adventurers from every
corner of the known world, one wonders _whose_ sons they were who, for
three centuries and more, so brilliantly led the van of modern European
culture, as it emerged from the darkness of the early Middle Ages.
Passing by such collateral issues, however, and admitting depopulation
to have been both real and serious, we may well ask whether it was not
the result of Roman decadence rather than its cause, the symptom of
some deep-seated social malady, not its origin. We are not concerned
here with the aristocracy of Rome, nor even with the people of Italy.
We are concerned with the Empire. We are not concerned with a passing
phase or fashion, but with a process which seems to have gone on with
increasing rapidity, through good times as well as bad, till the final
cataclysm. A local disease might have a local explanation, a transient
one might be due to a chance coincidence. But what can we say of a
disease which was apparently co-extensive with Imperial civilisation in
area, and which exceeded it in duration?
I find it hard to believe that either a selfish aversion to matrimony
or a mystical admiration for celibacy, though at certain periods the
one was common in Pagan and the other in Christian circles, were
more than elements in the complex of causes by which the result was
brought about. Like the plagues which devastated Europe in the second
and third centuries, they must have greatly aggravated the evil, but
they are hardly sufficient to account for it. Nor yet can we find
an explanation of it in the discouragement, the sense of impending
doom, by which men’s spirits were oppressed long before the Imperial
power began visibly to wane, for this is one of the things which, if
historically true, does itself most urgently require explanation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account