Deductions from the World WarFreytag-Loringhoven, Hugo Friedrich Philipp Johann, Freiherr von
History
Deductions from the World War
Freytag-Loringhoven, Hugo Friedrich Philipp Johann, Freiherr von
Germany. Heer; War; World War, 1914-1918
enveloping movement was very much restricted. The vast extent of
their territory always made it possible for the Russians to effect a
withdrawal. Their railway network, though of wide mesh, was
extraordinarily favourable from a strategic point of view, and by its
aid they were generally able to bring up reinforcements at the right
time to any wing that was threatened, while, in the case of ourselves
and our allies, our railway communications were not only very
circuitous, but, when it came to a further advance, ceased
altogether. In addition to this, with the extension of the Eastern
theatre of war, a blow inflicted on one wing of the Russians could
not have the same effect on the other sectors of their long front as
would have been the case if it had been of less extent.
Hence break-through tactics, which Napoleon attempted several times
on the restricted battlefields of his age, supported by powerful
heavy artillery, once again asserted their importance. Instances of
this were furnished at Gorlice, in the later battles in Galicia, as
well as between the Bug and the Vistula, in the breaking of the
Russian Narew front in the summer of 1915, and in the break-through
at Tarnopol in 1917. Also the Serbian and above all the Roumanian
campaigns furnished several similar instances. The preliminary
condition of success was always a moral and tactical superiority on
the side of the attacker, and a corresponding violence of mass
effect. The fact that we did not possess this moral and tactical
superiority in sufficient measure in the West has always relegated to
the background the idea of breaking through the enemy front. What
has to be done is not only on a comparatively limited front to break
in upon the enemy with concentrated masses--these masses will
immediately be exposed to outflanking on both sides--but to force in
a more or less considerable part of the enemy front, and then to
develop strategically the break-through which has succeeded
tactically. The extent of the success will in every case depend upon
the local conditions and the strategic situation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account