Deeds of heroism and bravery : $b The book of heroes and personal daring
History
Deeds of heroism and bravery : $b The book of heroes and personal daring
World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives
In spite of possible influence and efforts, Ambassador Gerard’s
intervention was unavailing, and on July 27th, the very day of the
execution, he telegraphed to London that his efforts to secure a
postponement of the trial were futile because the German Government
insisted that “the German submarine witnesses could not be further
detained.” In other words, the men whose business it was to conduct a
sea campaign of lawlessness and “frightfulness” could not be delayed
from their destructive work by anything so paltry as a consideration of
justice and honor in the trial of a prisoner.
GERMAN EXULTATION
Neither Sir Edward Grey and Ambassador Gerard, nor others interested
in securing a fair trial for the accused, imagined that his trial and
execution would be the hurried work of an afternoon, and there was
consternation when a Reuter despatch of July 28th gave the first news
of the shooting and made public the German _communiqué_ as follows:
“The accused was condemned to death because although he was not a
member of a combatant force, he made an attempt on the afternoon
of March 20, 1915, to ram the German submarine _U-33_ near the
Maas Lighthouse. The accused as well as the first officer and the
chief engineer of the steamer received at the time from the British
Admiralty a gold watch as a reward of his brave conduct on that
occasion, and his action was mentioned with praise in the House of
Commons.
“On the occasion in question, disregarding the U-boat’s signal to stop
and show his national flag, he turned at a critical moment at high
speed on the submarine, which escaped the steamer by a few meters only
by immediately diving. He confessed that in so doing he had acted in
accordance with instructions from the Admiralty.
“One of the many nefarious _franc-tireur_ proceedings of the British
Merchant Marine against our war vessels has thus found a belated but
merited expiation.”
This report aroused intense indignation in England, and hardly less
resentful feelings in neutral countries, especially in the United
States, whose Ambassador in Berlin was the intermediary of the English
protest against the basis of the court-martial. At once the British
Foreign Office addressed a note to Ambassador Page in London in which
was the statement:
“His Majesty’s Government finds it difficult to believe that a master
of a merchant ship who, after German submarines adopted the practice
of sinking merchant vessels without warning and without regard to the
lives of passengers or crew, took the only means at his disposal of
saving not only the vessel but the lives of all on board can have been
deliberately shot in cold blood for that action”; and the request was
made that urgent inquiry be made by the United States Embassy at Berlin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account