Deep Waters; Or, A Strange StoryCrozier, R. H. (Robert Hoskins)
Religion
Deep Waters; Or, A Strange Story
Crozier, R. H. (Robert Hoskins)
American fiction -- 19th century; Predestination -- Fiction; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Fiction
An event soon occurred in the town which aroused feelings and emotions
in the breast of Ernest, the statical condition of which had never
before been disturbed. A family moved into the town, among whose
members was a young man about the age of Ernest. A few days after their
arrival, a sign was seen over a store-door in large black letters--A.
J. Comston & Son. The “son” belonging to this firm is the only one
of the family whose life projects into the present history. Xerxes
Comston was the equal of Ernest in physical attractions, and his
superior in almost everything pertaining to the elegant frivolities and
conventional refinements of fashionable society. He was emphatically
a man of the world--a disciple of Chesterfield, who had made social
etiquette a special study. He had no depth of intellect and no solid
education, but was master of that small talk, silvery nonsense, so
delightful to vacuous minds. It is a well-known fact that truly
educated men, who have “drunk deep of the Pierian spring,” rarely ever
shine in promiscuous society. They appear timid and destitute of ideas,
while men who have collected only the scum of ephemeral literature, and
studied terpsichorean gymnastics, and committed to memory a stock of
witticisms pleasing to light-headed women, pass in society at a value
far more than their real worth. Xerxes was a man of this description.
He had studied dinner-table etiquette and ball-room dynamics more than
any other branch of human literature. The comparison between Ernest and
Xerxes in regard to moral excellences would be like that of Brobdingnag
and Lilliputian. Yet in fashionable assemblies, where Ernest would
sit in embarrassed silence, Xerxes would rattle away with astonishing
and entertaining volubility--a volubility without ideas, but still,
necessary to preserve the regular flow of the stream of conversation.
Men like Ernest are frequently voted “stupid” by the gilded butterflies
of society, when the truth is, they can scarcely ever find a
“pleasure-party” that can appreciate the subjects with which they are
familiar. They are not unsocial, as is generally supposed, but they
dwell in a world of thought, a world which is so sparsely settled that
they necessarily spend much or most of their time in solitude. This
class is quite small. Hence, speaking metaphorically, they live in a
wilderness in which there is here and there a house inhabited by a
literary recluse.
Ernest and Xerxes were, as to moral character, like Zenith and Nadir.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account