Defense of the Faith and the Saints (Volume 1 of 2)Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Religion
Defense of the Faith and the Saints (Volume 1 of 2)
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Latter Day Saint churches
Of course, you will remember that according to the Book of Mormon,
the Nephite colony carried with them to America so much Of the Old
Testament as was in existence at the time of their departure from
Jerusalem (600 years B.C.). The prophecy of Malachi, chapters 3 and
4, quoted in the Book of Mormon, was supplied by the Savior, and
that the Nephites engraved portions of these scriptures in their
records, and this both in the Hebrew, and what the Nephites called
the reformed Egyptian. I simply mention this in passing, that you
may remember afresh how these passages came to be in the Nephite
record, and that you may remember that the Nephites had the Jewish
scriptures in much the same form as they were to be found in Judea,
600 B.C. When the Savior came to the western world and appeared to
the Nephites, he had the same message to present to them that he
had presented in Palestine; the same ordinances of the gospel to
establish, a similar church organization to found, and the same
ethical principles to teach. The manner of the Savior's teaching
would doubtless lead him to present these great truths in the same
forms of expression he had used in teaching the Jews, so that in
substance what he had taught as his doctrines in Judea he would
repeat in America. This is mentioned also, by the way, that it may
appear reasonable to you that in a general manner the Savior must
have taught the people in the western hemisphere substantially
the same things that he taught the people in Palestine. With
this remembered, I think we find a solution of the difficulty
you present in the following way: When Joseph Smith saw that the
Nephite record was quoting the prophecies of Isaiah, of Malachi,
or the words of the Savior, he took the English Bible and compared
these passages as far as they paralleled each other, and finding
that in substance, in thought, they were alike, he adopted our
English translation; and hence, we have the sameness to which you
refer.
It should be understood also, in this connection, that while Joseph
Smith obtained the facts and ideas from the Nephite characters
through the inspiration of God, he was left to express those facts
and ideas, in the main, in such language as he could command; and
when he found that parts of the Nephite record closely paralleled
passages in the Bible, and being conscious that the language of
our English Bible was superior to his own, he adopted it, except
for those differences indicated in the Nephite original which
here and there make the Book of Mormon passages superior in sense
and clearness. Of course, I recognize the fact that this is but a
conjecture; but I believe it to be a reasonable one; and indeed the
only one which satisfactorily disposes of the difficulty you point
out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account