Defense of the Faith and the Saints (Volume 1 of 2)Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Religion
Defense of the Faith and the Saints (Volume 1 of 2)
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Latter Day Saint churches
The difficulty which you point out of course has been recognized
by believers in the Book of Mormon, but I do not know that I can
say that the Church as yet has settled upon any explanation which
could be regarded as an authoritative view on the subject. Each
one has been left to settle the matter upon the lines which seem
most reasonable to him; as a matter of fact, though our opponents
have frequently called attention to the difficulty in question,
it has not occasioned any particular anxiety in the minds of our
own people. Accepting the overwhelming evidences that exist for
the truth of the Book of Mormon, we have regarded that difficulty,
with some others, as of minor importance which would in time be
satisfactorily settled. Still, I realize the reasonableness of
the objection that may be urged against the Book of Mormon from
the point of view from which you present it, and realize that it
constitutes a real difficulty, and one, too, in which we have no
word from the Prophet Joseph Smith, or those who were immediately
associated with him in bringing forth the Nephite record, to aid us
in a solution of the matter. We are left, therefore, very largely
to conjecture, based on the facts in the case, which facts are most
tersely put in your esteemed communication; viz.:
First. It is a fact that a number of passages in the Book of
Mormon, verses and whole chapters, run closely parallel in matter
and phraseology with passages in Isaiah, Malachi and some parts of
the New Testament.
Second. It is a fact that no two persons will take the same
manuscript and make translations from one language into another,
and the language of the two translations be alike.
Third. It is a fact that the translations of the words of Isaiah,
of Malachi, and the words of the Savior, in the Book of Mormon, are
generally supposed to be independent translations from different
manuscripts or records and from different languages.
Then, of course, comes your question: how can the strange fact be
accounted for, viz., that the 'translation in the Book of Mormon
Corresponding to Isaiah, Malachi and the words of the Savior, are
in the language of King James' translation?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account